A large number of randomized controlled trials on critically ill patients has been published in the last years, yielding often opposite or inconclusive findings. To be continuously updated is thus becoming a hard task for physicians, who have to rely on experts’ guidelines to guide their practice. Democracy based medicine is a recently developed method which overcomes the limits of experts’ guidelines. This chapter summarize the consensus process, based on a systematic review, on a formal meeting to discuss and analyze the available evidence and where the consensus statements are produced, and on a dedicated web interface which allows to share intermediate findings gather consensus from colleagues worldwide. This Consensus Conference identified 7 interventions increasing survival and 8 interventions increasing mortality in the critically ill patients. Given the increasing complexity and width of medical literature, the Consensus process is a simple solution to reach a worldwide consensus among pairs on the best published evidence.

Decision making in the democracy-based medicine era: The consensus conference process / Greco, M.; Azzolini, M. L.; Monti, G.. - (2015), pp. 1-6. [10.1007/978-3-319-17515-7_1]

Decision making in the democracy-based medicine era: The consensus conference process

Monti G.
2015-01-01

Abstract

A large number of randomized controlled trials on critically ill patients has been published in the last years, yielding often opposite or inconclusive findings. To be continuously updated is thus becoming a hard task for physicians, who have to rely on experts’ guidelines to guide their practice. Democracy based medicine is a recently developed method which overcomes the limits of experts’ guidelines. This chapter summarize the consensus process, based on a systematic review, on a formal meeting to discuss and analyze the available evidence and where the consensus statements are produced, and on a dedicated web interface which allows to share intermediate findings gather consensus from colleagues worldwide. This Consensus Conference identified 7 interventions increasing survival and 8 interventions increasing mortality in the critically ill patients. Given the increasing complexity and width of medical literature, the Consensus process is a simple solution to reach a worldwide consensus among pairs on the best published evidence.
2015
Critically ill
Democracy-based medicine
Subjective refraction
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/144437
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact