In this paper, the authors present a presuppositional account for a class of evaluative terms that encode both a descriptive and an evaluative component: slurs and thick terms. The authors discuss several issues related to the hybrid nature of these terms, such as their projective behavior, the ways in which one may reject their evaluative content, and the ways in which evaluative content is entailed or implicated (as the case may be) by the use of such terms.

Hybrid Evaluatives: In Defense of a Presuppositional Account / Cepollaro, B; Stojanovic, I. - In: GRAZER PHILOSOPHISCHE STUDIEN. - ISSN 0165-9227. - 93:3(2016), pp. 458-488. [10.1163/18756735-09303007]

Hybrid Evaluatives: In Defense of a Presuppositional Account

Cepollaro B;
2016-01-01

Abstract

In this paper, the authors present a presuppositional account for a class of evaluative terms that encode both a descriptive and an evaluative component: slurs and thick terms. The authors discuss several issues related to the hybrid nature of these terms, such as their projective behavior, the ways in which one may reject their evaluative content, and the ways in which evaluative content is entailed or implicated (as the case may be) by the use of such terms.
2016
Inglese
93
3
458
488
31
Pubblicato
Esperti anonimi
Internazionale
Expressive content; Thick terms; Slurs
Questo articolo è in fascia A per l'area 11/C4
Hybrid Evaluatives: In Defense of a Presuppositional Account / Cepollaro, B; Stojanovic, I. - In: GRAZER PHILOSOPHISCHE STUDIEN. - ISSN 0165-9227. - 93:3(2016), pp. 458-488. [10.1163/18756735-09303007]
none
2
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Cepollaro, B; Stojanovic, I
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/100925
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 75
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 34
social impact