This analysis of patients from prospective trials of salvage therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma did not identify a prognostic effect for number of prior lines of therapy and prior perioperative chemotherapy. Performance status, hemoglobin, liver metastasis, and time from prior chemotherapy were prognostic for outcomes. These findings allow trials to use uniform eligibility criteria, which will enhance accrual and improve interpretability. Background: The differential impact of the number of prior lines of therapy and the setting of prior therapy (perioperative or metastatic) is unclear in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Patients and Methods: Ten phase II trials of salvage chemotherapy, biologic agent therapy, or both, enrolling 731 patients, were available. Data on the number of prior lines of therapy and the setting of prior therapy were required in addition to known previously recognized prognostic factors: time from prior chemotherapy, hemoglobin level, performance status, and liver metastasis status. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association of the number of prior lines and prior perioperative therapy with overall survival (OS) as the primary clinical endpoint. Trial was a stratification factor. Results: A total of 711 patients were evaluable. The overall median progression-free survival and OS were 2.7 and 6.8 months, respectively. The number of prior lines was 1 in 559 patients (78.6%), 2 in 111 (15.6%), 3 in 29 (4.1%), 4 in 10 (1.4%), and 5 in 2 (0.3%). Prior perioperative chemotherapy was given to 277 (39.1%) and chemotherapy for metastatic disease to 454 (64.1%). The number of prior lines was not independently associated with OS (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86-1.14). Prior perioperative chemotherapy was a favorable factor for OS on univariate but not multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The number of prior lines of therapy and prior perioperative chemotherapy were not independently prognostic in patients with urothelial carcinoma receiving salvage therapy. Adoption of these data in salvage therapy trials should enhance accrual, the interpretability of results, and drug development.

Impact of the Number of Prior Lines of Therapy and Prior Perioperative Chemotherapy in Patients Receiving Salvage Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Implications for Trial Design / Pond, Gr; Bellmunt, J; Rosenberg, Je; Bajorin, Df; Regazzi, Am; Choueiri, Tk; Qu, Aq; Niegisch, G; Albers, P; Necchi, A; Di Lorenzo, G; Fougeray, R; Wong, Yn; Sridhar, Ss; Ko, Yj; Milowsky, Mi; Galsky, Md; Sonpavde, G. - In: CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER. - ISSN 1558-7673. - 13:1(2015), pp. 71-79. [10.1016/j.clgc.2014.06.004]

Impact of the Number of Prior Lines of Therapy and Prior Perioperative Chemotherapy in Patients Receiving Salvage Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Implications for Trial Design

Necchi A;
2015-01-01

Abstract

This analysis of patients from prospective trials of salvage therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma did not identify a prognostic effect for number of prior lines of therapy and prior perioperative chemotherapy. Performance status, hemoglobin, liver metastasis, and time from prior chemotherapy were prognostic for outcomes. These findings allow trials to use uniform eligibility criteria, which will enhance accrual and improve interpretability. Background: The differential impact of the number of prior lines of therapy and the setting of prior therapy (perioperative or metastatic) is unclear in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Patients and Methods: Ten phase II trials of salvage chemotherapy, biologic agent therapy, or both, enrolling 731 patients, were available. Data on the number of prior lines of therapy and the setting of prior therapy were required in addition to known previously recognized prognostic factors: time from prior chemotherapy, hemoglobin level, performance status, and liver metastasis status. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association of the number of prior lines and prior perioperative therapy with overall survival (OS) as the primary clinical endpoint. Trial was a stratification factor. Results: A total of 711 patients were evaluable. The overall median progression-free survival and OS were 2.7 and 6.8 months, respectively. The number of prior lines was 1 in 559 patients (78.6%), 2 in 111 (15.6%), 3 in 29 (4.1%), 4 in 10 (1.4%), and 5 in 2 (0.3%). Prior perioperative chemotherapy was given to 277 (39.1%) and chemotherapy for metastatic disease to 454 (64.1%). The number of prior lines was not independently associated with OS (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86-1.14). Prior perioperative chemotherapy was a favorable factor for OS on univariate but not multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The number of prior lines of therapy and prior perioperative chemotherapy were not independently prognostic in patients with urothelial carcinoma receiving salvage therapy. Adoption of these data in salvage therapy trials should enhance accrual, the interpretability of results, and drug development.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/105801
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact