Background: Residual retroperitoneal masses in NSGCT need postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (PC-RPLND). Open (O) PC-RPLND is a standardized procedure, but morbidity is not negligible and mostly attributable to laparotomy. Laparoscopic (L) PC-RPLND may improve tolerability profile. We evaluated viability, toxicity, and short to medium-term oncologic outcome of L-PC-RPLND following well-defined selection criteria. Patients and Methods: Since February 2011, consecutive patients with a unilateral residual mass (1cm or growing), normalized markers, and limited encasement of inferior vena cava and/or aorta were candidate to unilateral L-PC-RPLND. Surgical performances, histology, hospital stay, complications within 30 days, and survival were recorded. Patients were regularly followed up. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not provided. Results: Sixty-seven patients (stage IIA=14; IIB=41; IIC=7; III=5), representing 29% of all those candidate to PC-RPLND in this time frame, underwent L-PC-RPLND up to August 2015. Median size of the mass was 27mm (interquartile range [IQR] 15-31). Median operative time was 234 minutes (IQR 184-250). Three procedures were converted to open surgery. Mean hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 2-4). Out of three (4.5%), one grade III (lymphocele requiring drainage) complication occurred. Sixty-six (98.5%) patients maintained antegrade ejaculation. Histology revealed teratoma in 76%, fibronecrotic tissue in 21%, and viable cancer in 3% patients. All patients are alive and event free after a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR 10-30). Conclusions: In a referral center, L-PC-RPLND is a transferable option for a proportion of patients with a residual mass. Tolerability is acceptable, and current oncologic outcome is consistent with a safe oncologic profile.

Laparoscopic Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph-Node Dissection Can Be a Standard Option in Defined Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor Patients / Nicolai, N; Cattaneo, F; Biasoni, D; Catanzaro, M; Torelli, T; Zazzara, M; Necchi, A; Giannatempo, P; Raggi, D; Piva, L; Colecchia, M; Salvioni, R; Stagni, S. - In: JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY. - ISSN 0892-7790. - 30:10(2016), pp. 1112-1119. [10.1089/end.2016.0458]

Laparoscopic Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph-Node Dissection Can Be a Standard Option in Defined Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor Patients

Necchi A;Colecchia M;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Background: Residual retroperitoneal masses in NSGCT need postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (PC-RPLND). Open (O) PC-RPLND is a standardized procedure, but morbidity is not negligible and mostly attributable to laparotomy. Laparoscopic (L) PC-RPLND may improve tolerability profile. We evaluated viability, toxicity, and short to medium-term oncologic outcome of L-PC-RPLND following well-defined selection criteria. Patients and Methods: Since February 2011, consecutive patients with a unilateral residual mass (1cm or growing), normalized markers, and limited encasement of inferior vena cava and/or aorta were candidate to unilateral L-PC-RPLND. Surgical performances, histology, hospital stay, complications within 30 days, and survival were recorded. Patients were regularly followed up. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not provided. Results: Sixty-seven patients (stage IIA=14; IIB=41; IIC=7; III=5), representing 29% of all those candidate to PC-RPLND in this time frame, underwent L-PC-RPLND up to August 2015. Median size of the mass was 27mm (interquartile range [IQR] 15-31). Median operative time was 234 minutes (IQR 184-250). Three procedures were converted to open surgery. Mean hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 2-4). Out of three (4.5%), one grade III (lymphocele requiring drainage) complication occurred. Sixty-six (98.5%) patients maintained antegrade ejaculation. Histology revealed teratoma in 76%, fibronecrotic tissue in 21%, and viable cancer in 3% patients. All patients are alive and event free after a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR 10-30). Conclusions: In a referral center, L-PC-RPLND is a transferable option for a proportion of patients with a residual mass. Tolerability is acceptable, and current oncologic outcome is consistent with a safe oncologic profile.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/105847
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact