Purpose To describe the optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) features of treatment-naïve quiescent choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration, and to estimate the detection rate for neovascularization by means of OCT-A. Design Diagnostic tool validity assessment. Methods Treatment-naïve quiescent CNV were identified from a pool of patients at 2 retina referral centers. Patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination including fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and OCT-A. Detection rates of CNV by means of OCT-A were estimated with a second cohort of patients without CNV (negative controls). Results Twenty-two eyes of 20 consecutive patients with quiescent CNV were included. In 4 out of 22 eyes it was not possible to classify the CNV “shape,” “core,” “margin,” and “location,” either because the vascular network was not clearly shown (3 cases) or because it was not visible at all (1 case). CNV shape on OCT-A was rated as circular in 8 eyes and irregular in 10 eyes. CNV core was visible in 2 eyes. CNV margin was considered as well defined in 15 eyes and poorly defined in 3 eyes. CNV margin showed small loops in 9 eyes and large loops in the other 6 eyes. CNV location was foveal-sparing in 12 eyes. Sensitivity and specificity of quiescent CNV detection by OCT-A turned out to be 81.8% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions OCT-A allows the clinician to noninvasively identify treatment-naïve quiescent CNV and may be considered as a useful tool to guide the frequency of return visits and, possibly, make treatment decisions.

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Useful Tool for Diagnosis of Treatment-Naïve Quiescent Choroidal Neovascularization

Cicinelli M. V.;Bandello F.;Querques G.
2016-01-01

Abstract

Purpose To describe the optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) features of treatment-naïve quiescent choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration, and to estimate the detection rate for neovascularization by means of OCT-A. Design Diagnostic tool validity assessment. Methods Treatment-naïve quiescent CNV were identified from a pool of patients at 2 retina referral centers. Patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination including fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, and OCT-A. Detection rates of CNV by means of OCT-A were estimated with a second cohort of patients without CNV (negative controls). Results Twenty-two eyes of 20 consecutive patients with quiescent CNV were included. In 4 out of 22 eyes it was not possible to classify the CNV “shape,” “core,” “margin,” and “location,” either because the vascular network was not clearly shown (3 cases) or because it was not visible at all (1 case). CNV shape on OCT-A was rated as circular in 8 eyes and irregular in 10 eyes. CNV core was visible in 2 eyes. CNV margin was considered as well defined in 15 eyes and poorly defined in 3 eyes. CNV margin showed small loops in 9 eyes and large loops in the other 6 eyes. CNV location was foveal-sparing in 12 eyes. Sensitivity and specificity of quiescent CNV detection by OCT-A turned out to be 81.8% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions OCT-A allows the clinician to noninvasively identify treatment-naïve quiescent CNV and may be considered as a useful tool to guide the frequency of return visits and, possibly, make treatment decisions.
2016
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Choroid
Choroidal Neovascularization
Coloring Agents
Female
Humans
Indocyanine Green
Macular Degeneration
Male
Middle Aged
Referral and Consultation
Reproducibility of Results
Fluorescein Angiography
Tomography, Optical Coherence
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/107925
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 130
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 114
social impact