Introduction: To evaluate the outcomes of the preloaded stent-graft design (PLD) in the routine treatment of pararenal and thoraco-abdominal aneurysms compared to the standard design (SND). Methods: Patients treated by fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair from 2013 were collected. Since 2017, PLD (23F delivery system) was implemented in our standard practice and the outcomes are reported. Primary outcome measurements were: technical success, 30-day adverse events, leg ischemia time, procedural time and radiation exposure. Secondary outcome measurements were: intraoperative urinary output, need of bicarbonate supplementation, postoperative biomarkers elevations and need for blood transfusions. A propensity 1:1 matching for graft design and aneurysm extent was performed with the SND (18F delivery system) cohort to highlight possible PLD advantages. Results: A PLD was employed in 32 non-consecutive patients with a technical and clinical success rate of 100% and 81% respectively: no mortality was recorded. The Society for Vascular Surgery grade ≥ 1 adverse event was observed in 10 cases (31%): five temporary paraparesis were observed. Seventeen PLD patients were matched. The procedural time was shorter in PLD group (266 vs. 390 min; p = 0.001) as well as fluoroscopy time (68 vs. 96 min; p = 0.019) and contrast media used (180 vs. 382 ml; p = 0.045). Contralateral limb ischemic time was significantly higher in SND group (0 vs. 70 min; p = 0.042). The need for blood transfusion and the postoperative peak of creatine phosphokinase was lower in PLD group (151 vs. 449 U/l; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Preloaded stent-graft design allows a uni-femoral approach in the majority of the interventions reducing procedural times and the ischemia on the contralateral leg, leading to possible benefits.

Early Limb Reperfusion Using Routinely Preloaded Fenestrated Stent-graft Designs for Complex Endovascular Aortic Procedures

Bertoglio L.;Melloni A.;Melissano G.;Chiesa R.
2020-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate the outcomes of the preloaded stent-graft design (PLD) in the routine treatment of pararenal and thoraco-abdominal aneurysms compared to the standard design (SND). Methods: Patients treated by fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair from 2013 were collected. Since 2017, PLD (23F delivery system) was implemented in our standard practice and the outcomes are reported. Primary outcome measurements were: technical success, 30-day adverse events, leg ischemia time, procedural time and radiation exposure. Secondary outcome measurements were: intraoperative urinary output, need of bicarbonate supplementation, postoperative biomarkers elevations and need for blood transfusions. A propensity 1:1 matching for graft design and aneurysm extent was performed with the SND (18F delivery system) cohort to highlight possible PLD advantages. Results: A PLD was employed in 32 non-consecutive patients with a technical and clinical success rate of 100% and 81% respectively: no mortality was recorded. The Society for Vascular Surgery grade ≥ 1 adverse event was observed in 10 cases (31%): five temporary paraparesis were observed. Seventeen PLD patients were matched. The procedural time was shorter in PLD group (266 vs. 390 min; p = 0.001) as well as fluoroscopy time (68 vs. 96 min; p = 0.019) and contrast media used (180 vs. 382 ml; p = 0.045). Contralateral limb ischemic time was significantly higher in SND group (0 vs. 70 min; p = 0.042). The need for blood transfusion and the postoperative peak of creatine phosphokinase was lower in PLD group (151 vs. 449 U/l; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Preloaded stent-graft design allows a uni-femoral approach in the majority of the interventions reducing procedural times and the ischemia on the contralateral leg, leading to possible benefits.
2020
Branched
Endovascular
Fenestrated
Ischemia
Limb
Paraplegia
Spinal cord
Thoraco-abdominal aneurysms
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/107985
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact