BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to report our results with carotid body tumor (CBT) surgical management. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2018, 100 CBTs (mean age: 48.0 years, range 21-80 years old) were treated in our center. The patients were classified in 3 groups according to the size: group I (<3 cm), group II (3 to 5 cm) and group III (>5 cm). RESULTS: Surgical resection was performed in 88 patients and conservative treatment in 2 cases. Nine patients were treated for bilateral involvement and one of them was also treated again for a relapse. Postoperatively, cranial nerve injury (CNI) was significantly higher in group II [3 (8.3%) vs. 16 (31.4%) vs. 2 (15.4%); P=0.030] with no statistical differences between the CN involved. At univariate analysis for CNI, CBT group (P=0.030), maximum diameter (P=0.046), patients presenting with dysphonia (P=0.035) and dysphagia (P=0.007) and patients suffering from any intraoperative complication (P=0.047) were statistically significant. At multivariate analysis the only significant variable was CBT group II (P=0.016). For blood loss, CBT group III (P<0.001), Shamblin class III (P<0.001), Pulmonary disease (P=0.034) and surgery time (P<0.001) were statistically significant. The follow-up of 79 patients (87.8%) showed a 100% overall survival at median follow-up of 37.7 months (range 2-84.7 months) with freedom from local recurrence of 97.8% (77/79); CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection remains the gold standard to obtain complete recovery, although tumor size is to be considered a risk factor for CNI because large CBTs remain at high risk for CNIs.

Carotid body tumor contemporary management in a high-volume center

Melissano G.;Chiesa R.
2020-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to report our results with carotid body tumor (CBT) surgical management. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2018, 100 CBTs (mean age: 48.0 years, range 21-80 years old) were treated in our center. The patients were classified in 3 groups according to the size: group I (<3 cm), group II (3 to 5 cm) and group III (>5 cm). RESULTS: Surgical resection was performed in 88 patients and conservative treatment in 2 cases. Nine patients were treated for bilateral involvement and one of them was also treated again for a relapse. Postoperatively, cranial nerve injury (CNI) was significantly higher in group II [3 (8.3%) vs. 16 (31.4%) vs. 2 (15.4%); P=0.030] with no statistical differences between the CN involved. At univariate analysis for CNI, CBT group (P=0.030), maximum diameter (P=0.046), patients presenting with dysphonia (P=0.035) and dysphagia (P=0.007) and patients suffering from any intraoperative complication (P=0.047) were statistically significant. At multivariate analysis the only significant variable was CBT group II (P=0.016). For blood loss, CBT group III (P<0.001), Shamblin class III (P<0.001), Pulmonary disease (P=0.034) and surgery time (P<0.001) were statistically significant. The follow-up of 79 patients (87.8%) showed a 100% overall survival at median follow-up of 37.7 months (range 2-84.7 months) with freedom from local recurrence of 97.8% (77/79); CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection remains the gold standard to obtain complete recovery, although tumor size is to be considered a risk factor for CNI because large CBTs remain at high risk for CNIs.
2020
Carotid body tumor
Cranial nerve injuries
Paraganglioma
Surgical procedures, operative
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiography
Carotid Body Tumor
Conservative Treatment
Contrast Media
Embolization, Therapeutic
Female
Humans
Iopamidol
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Radiotherapy
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Survival Rate
Vascular Surgical Procedures
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/107992
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact