Purpose: To analyze lymph node invasion (LNI) rates according to tumor characteristics and to test the impact of LNI and its extent on cancer specific mortality (CSM) in surgically-treated non metastatic urothelial upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) patients. Materials and methods: Within the SEER database (2004–2014), we identified 2098 patients with histologically confirmed non-metastatic urothelial carcinoma of renal pelvis or ureter who underwent NU with LND. LNI rates stratified according to tumor location and stage were described. Kaplan-Meier plots illustrated CSM rates according to LNI and its extent. Multivariable Cox regression models (MCRMs) tested the effect of LNI and its extent on CSM. Results: Of 2098 UTUC patients, who underwent nephroureterectomy with lymph node dissection, 646 (33%) had LNI. The median number of removed lymph nodes was 3 [Interquartile range (IQR): 1–7]. The median number of positive lymph nodes in patients, who harbored LNI was 1 (IQR:1–3). LNI rates according to tumor location were, respectively, 23.6% for ureteral and 36.5% for renal pelvis tumors. LNI rates according to tumor stage were 9.6, 18.0, 38.7 and 63.9%, for respectively, T1, T2, T3 and T4 UTUC. In MCRMs, LNI achieved independent predictor status for higher CSM (HR 3.00; p < 0.001). Finally, in MCRMs, number of positive lymph nodes defined as the 75th percentile (n ≥ 3) achieved independent predictor status for higher CSM (HR 1.37; p = 0.04). Conclusions: LNI in non-metastatic UTUC patients is the most important determinant of CSM. Number of positive lymph node is independently associated with higher CSM. In consequence, lymph node dissection can provide extensive prognostic information.

Rates of lymph node invasion and their impact on cancer specific mortality in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Mazzone E.;Briganti A.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze lymph node invasion (LNI) rates according to tumor characteristics and to test the impact of LNI and its extent on cancer specific mortality (CSM) in surgically-treated non metastatic urothelial upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) patients. Materials and methods: Within the SEER database (2004–2014), we identified 2098 patients with histologically confirmed non-metastatic urothelial carcinoma of renal pelvis or ureter who underwent NU with LND. LNI rates stratified according to tumor location and stage were described. Kaplan-Meier plots illustrated CSM rates according to LNI and its extent. Multivariable Cox regression models (MCRMs) tested the effect of LNI and its extent on CSM. Results: Of 2098 UTUC patients, who underwent nephroureterectomy with lymph node dissection, 646 (33%) had LNI. The median number of removed lymph nodes was 3 [Interquartile range (IQR): 1–7]. The median number of positive lymph nodes in patients, who harbored LNI was 1 (IQR:1–3). LNI rates according to tumor location were, respectively, 23.6% for ureteral and 36.5% for renal pelvis tumors. LNI rates according to tumor stage were 9.6, 18.0, 38.7 and 63.9%, for respectively, T1, T2, T3 and T4 UTUC. In MCRMs, LNI achieved independent predictor status for higher CSM (HR 3.00; p < 0.001). Finally, in MCRMs, number of positive lymph nodes defined as the 75th percentile (n ≥ 3) achieved independent predictor status for higher CSM (HR 1.37; p = 0.04). Conclusions: LNI in non-metastatic UTUC patients is the most important determinant of CSM. Number of positive lymph node is independently associated with higher CSM. In consequence, lymph node dissection can provide extensive prognostic information.
2019
Lymph node dissection
Lymph nodes
SEER
Upper urinary tract
Urothelial carcinoma
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Female
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms
Kidney Pelvis
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Staging
Nephroureterectomy
Prognosis
SEER Program
Ureteral Neoplasms
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/108535
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact