Purpose: To test the effect of tumor location (urachal vs. non-urachal) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder (ADKUB). Materials and methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (2004–2016), we identified patients with non-metastatic (≤ T4N0M0) ADKUB. Stratification was made according to tumor location: urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB. Kaplan–Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models were fitted before and after 1:3 propensity score (PS) matching and separate Cox regression models were refitted before and after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results: Of 1681 patients, 226 (13.5%) vs. 1455 (86.5%) harboured urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB, respectively. Five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were, respectively, 75 vs. 67% for urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB (p = 0.001). In subgroup analyses of ≤ T2N0M0 patients, 5-year CSS rates were, respectively, 84 vs. 73% for urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB (p = 0.006). In subgroup analyses of T3-4N0M0 patients, 5-year CSS rates were, respectively, 68 vs. 49% for urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB (p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression models, urachal ADKUB was associated with lower CSM rates (HR 0.6; p = 0.01). Virtually, the same findings were recorded after 1:3 PS matching (HR 0.6; p = 0.009) as well as when Cox regression models were refitted after IPTW (HR 0.7; p = 0.01). Conclusion: The distinction between urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB indicates better prognosis when the origin of the tumor is urachal, regardless of methodological approach used for the comparison.

Survival of contemporary patients with non-metastatic urachal vs. non-urachal adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder

Rosiello G.;Briganti A.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: To test the effect of tumor location (urachal vs. non-urachal) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder (ADKUB). Materials and methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (2004–2016), we identified patients with non-metastatic (≤ T4N0M0) ADKUB. Stratification was made according to tumor location: urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB. Kaplan–Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models were fitted before and after 1:3 propensity score (PS) matching and separate Cox regression models were refitted before and after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results: Of 1681 patients, 226 (13.5%) vs. 1455 (86.5%) harboured urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB, respectively. Five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were, respectively, 75 vs. 67% for urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB (p = 0.001). In subgroup analyses of ≤ T2N0M0 patients, 5-year CSS rates were, respectively, 84 vs. 73% for urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB (p = 0.006). In subgroup analyses of T3-4N0M0 patients, 5-year CSS rates were, respectively, 68 vs. 49% for urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB (p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression models, urachal ADKUB was associated with lower CSM rates (HR 0.6; p = 0.01). Virtually, the same findings were recorded after 1:3 PS matching (HR 0.6; p = 0.009) as well as when Cox regression models were refitted after IPTW (HR 0.7; p = 0.01). Conclusion: The distinction between urachal vs. non-urachal ADKUB indicates better prognosis when the origin of the tumor is urachal, regardless of methodological approach used for the comparison.
2020
Inglese
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
38
11
2819
2826
8
Epub ahead of print
Adenocarcinoma
Inverse probability of treatment weighting
Non-urachal
Propensity score
Urachal
none
14
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Luzzago, S.; Palumbo, C.; Rosiello, G.; Pecoraro, A.; Deuker, M.; Mistretta, F. A.; Tian, Z.; Musi, G.; Montanari, E.; Shariat, S. F.; Saad, F.; Briga...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/108646
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact