Background: International guidelines suggest a watchful strategy for small nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management and indications for surgery in patients with asymptomatic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ≤2 cm. Methods: Patients with asymptomatic, incidental, sporadic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ≤2 cm without nodal or distant metastases were included (2012–2016). A comparison between active surveillance and surgery groups was performed. Results: Of the 101 included patients, 72% underwent active surveillanc and 28% were surgically treated. Patients submitted to surgery were significantly younger (53 vs 60 years, P =.013), had a higher incidence of positive 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18% vs 50%, P =.003), and a higher incidence of cytologically determined G2 tumor (0% vs 14%, P =.008). Conservatively managed patients had a significantly smaller tumor size (12 vs 16 mm, P =.0001). The main reasons determining surgical choice were as follows: patient's preference (32%), positive 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (21.5%), main pancreatic duct dilation (17.5%), cytologically determined G2 tumor (14.5%), and young age (14.5%). At a median follow-up of 40 months, all of the 73 patients conservatively managed were alive, with no evidence of distant metastases and none underwent surgery. Only 5 patients had a tumor growth >20%. Conclusion: One-third of patients with asymptomatic small nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ≤2 cm underwent surgery. Patient's preference, initial tumor size, and young age were the main determinants of surgical indication. Preoperative diagnostic workup, including 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and cytologic grading, seems to be poorly accurate in determining malignant features in these small lesions.

Management of small asymptomatic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Limitations to apply guidelines into real life

Partelli S.;Mazza M.;Andreasi V.;Crippa S.;Falconi M.
2019-01-01

Abstract

Background: International guidelines suggest a watchful strategy for small nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management and indications for surgery in patients with asymptomatic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ≤2 cm. Methods: Patients with asymptomatic, incidental, sporadic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ≤2 cm without nodal or distant metastases were included (2012–2016). A comparison between active surveillance and surgery groups was performed. Results: Of the 101 included patients, 72% underwent active surveillanc and 28% were surgically treated. Patients submitted to surgery were significantly younger (53 vs 60 years, P =.013), had a higher incidence of positive 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18% vs 50%, P =.003), and a higher incidence of cytologically determined G2 tumor (0% vs 14%, P =.008). Conservatively managed patients had a significantly smaller tumor size (12 vs 16 mm, P =.0001). The main reasons determining surgical choice were as follows: patient's preference (32%), positive 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (21.5%), main pancreatic duct dilation (17.5%), cytologically determined G2 tumor (14.5%), and young age (14.5%). At a median follow-up of 40 months, all of the 73 patients conservatively managed were alive, with no evidence of distant metastases and none underwent surgery. Only 5 patients had a tumor growth >20%. Conclusion: One-third of patients with asymptomatic small nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors ≤2 cm underwent surgery. Patient's preference, initial tumor size, and young age were the main determinants of surgical indication. Preoperative diagnostic workup, including 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and cytologic grading, seems to be poorly accurate in determining malignant features in these small lesions.
2019
Inglese
Mosby Inc.
166
2
157
163
7
Pubblicato
Aged
Cohort Studies
Female
Guideline Adherence
Humans
Incidental Findings
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Staging
Pancreatectomy
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Positron-Emission Tomography
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Survival Rate
Watchful Waiting
No
none
7
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Partelli, S.; Mazza, M.; Andreasi, V.; Muffatti, F.; Crippa, S.; Tamburrino, D.; Falconi, M.
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/108869
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 49
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 47
social impact