Improvements in sensor accuracy, greater convenience and ease of use, and expanding reimbursement have led to growing adoption of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, successful utilization of CGM technology in routine clinical practice remains relatively low. This may be due in part to the lack of clear and agreed-upon glycemic targets that both diabetes teams and people with diabetes can work toward. Although unified recommendations for use of key CGM metrics have been established in three separate peer-reviewed articles, formal adoption by diabetes professional organizations and guidance in the practical application of these metrics in clinical practice have been lacking. In February 2019, the Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes (ATTD) Congress convened an international panel of physicians, researchers, and individuals with diabetes who are expert in CGM technologies to address this issue. This article summarizes the ATTD consensus recommendations for relevant aspects of CGM data utilization and reporting among the various diabetes populations.

Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: Recommendations from the international consensus on time in range

Bosi E.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Improvements in sensor accuracy, greater convenience and ease of use, and expanding reimbursement have led to growing adoption of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, successful utilization of CGM technology in routine clinical practice remains relatively low. This may be due in part to the lack of clear and agreed-upon glycemic targets that both diabetes teams and people with diabetes can work toward. Although unified recommendations for use of key CGM metrics have been established in three separate peer-reviewed articles, formal adoption by diabetes professional organizations and guidance in the practical application of these metrics in clinical practice have been lacking. In February 2019, the Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes (ATTD) Congress convened an international panel of physicians, researchers, and individuals with diabetes who are expert in CGM technologies to address this issue. This article summarizes the ATTD consensus recommendations for relevant aspects of CGM data utilization and reporting among the various diabetes populations.
2019
Inglese
American Diabetes Association Inc.
42
8
1593
1603
11
Pubblicato
Blood Glucose
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Consensus
Data Accuracy
Diabetes Mellitus
Glycated Hemoglobin A
Humans
Internationality
Reference Values
Time Factors
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Patient Care Planning
Practice Guidelines as Topic
none
42
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Battelino, T.; Danne, T.; Bergenstal, R. M.; Amiel, S. A.; Beck, R.; Biester, T.; Bosi, E.; Buckingham, B. A.; Cefalu, W. T.; Close, K. L.; Cobelli, C...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/109386
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3304
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3039
social impact