The aim of this work is to discuss two possible integrations to Magni’s recent book on the contribution empirical research could provide to the philosophical debate on responsibility. I will, therefore, introduce the general aim and the central method of the book (§1). Then, I will focus on the contribution empirical research can provide by considering experimental philosophy (§2) and the empirical research on implicit biases. I will, thus, conclude that these two examples would allow Magni to argue for the need of a dialogue between ethics and sciences also as far as the debate on responsibility is concerned (§4).

Responsabilità tra filosofia e scienza

Sarah Songhorian
2021-01-01

Abstract

The aim of this work is to discuss two possible integrations to Magni’s recent book on the contribution empirical research could provide to the philosophical debate on responsibility. I will, therefore, introduce the general aim and the central method of the book (§1). Then, I will focus on the contribution empirical research can provide by considering experimental philosophy (§2) and the empirical research on implicit biases. I will, thus, conclude that these two examples would allow Magni to argue for the need of a dialogue between ethics and sciences also as far as the debate on responsibility is concerned (§4).
2021
Responsibility, Thought experiments, Experimental philosophy, Implicit bias.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/117072
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact