Introduction: Unlike secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) in the setting of left ventricular disease, results of surgical treatment of severe atrial functional MR has remained largely unspoken. The aim of this study is to analyze short to midterm results of isolated ring annuloplasty in patients with severe atrial functional MR, in comparison with a matched cohort of patients with secondary MR. Methods: A retrospective review of our Institutional database was carried out to find all patients fulfilling strict echocardiographic criteria to define atrial functional MR. A control group of patients with MR secondary to ventricular disease was selected. All patients underwent mitral repair by means of isolated ring annuloplasty. Mortality, reoperation for severe MR, and recurrence of MR were assessed by clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) of recurrence of MR using death and reoperation as the competitive risk was used. Results: Twenty patients were selected for the study group and 25 for the control group. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of mortality and reoperation rate. At 2 years, the CIF of recurrence of MR ≥ 3+ and ≥ 2+ was significantly higher in patients with secondary MR compared to patients with atrial functional MR (20.8 ± 8.29% vs 5.9 ± 5.71% and 45.8 ± 10.17% vs 5.9 ± 5.71%). Conclusion: In patients with severe atrial functional MR, mitral valve repair by means of isolated ring annuloplasty seems a more effective and durable treatment as compared to patients with MR secondary to ventricular disease. Larger cohorts with longer follow up are needed to confirm these results.

Is mitral annuloplasty an effective treatment for severe atrial functional mitral regurgitation?

Ascione G.;Castiglioni A.;Alfieri O.;De Bonis M.
2021-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: Unlike secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) in the setting of left ventricular disease, results of surgical treatment of severe atrial functional MR has remained largely unspoken. The aim of this study is to analyze short to midterm results of isolated ring annuloplasty in patients with severe atrial functional MR, in comparison with a matched cohort of patients with secondary MR. Methods: A retrospective review of our Institutional database was carried out to find all patients fulfilling strict echocardiographic criteria to define atrial functional MR. A control group of patients with MR secondary to ventricular disease was selected. All patients underwent mitral repair by means of isolated ring annuloplasty. Mortality, reoperation for severe MR, and recurrence of MR were assessed by clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) of recurrence of MR using death and reoperation as the competitive risk was used. Results: Twenty patients were selected for the study group and 25 for the control group. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of mortality and reoperation rate. At 2 years, the CIF of recurrence of MR ≥ 3+ and ≥ 2+ was significantly higher in patients with secondary MR compared to patients with atrial functional MR (20.8 ± 8.29% vs 5.9 ± 5.71% and 45.8 ± 10.17% vs 5.9 ± 5.71%). Conclusion: In patients with severe atrial functional MR, mitral valve repair by means of isolated ring annuloplasty seems a more effective and durable treatment as compared to patients with MR secondary to ventricular disease. Larger cohorts with longer follow up are needed to confirm these results.
2021
annuloplasty
atrial fibrillation
atrial functional MR
mitral regurgitation
mitral valve repair
Humans
Mitral Valve
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Mitral Valve Annuloplasty
Mitral Valve Insufficiency
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/118873
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact