Purpose: To evaluate the short–term efficacy of juxtascleral triamcinolone acetonide (JSTA) versus intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injections on macular thickness measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and on visual acuity (VA) in eyes affected by diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to laser treatment. Methods: Eyes of diabetic patients affected by DME without vitreo–retinal interface anomalies are being randomized to one of the following two treatment groups: JSTA (group 1) and IVTA (group 2). All patients had normal intraocular pressure (IOP) and underwent previous laser treatment of posterior pole. At present are included in group 1 (JSTA) 9 eyes of 9 patients, and in group 2 (IVTA) 14 eyes of 14 patients. Controls (complete ophthalmological examination, OCT, fundus photographies) were scheduled at days 0, 7, 30, 90, 180. Fluorescein angiography was scheduled at days 0, 30, 90,180. The patients of group 1 that, at seven days control, showed a decrease of DME 100 µ m on OCT, underwent a second injection (JSTA). Results: Seven days after injection, macular thickness significantly decreased only in group 2 (mean thickness: – 47.5 ± 125 µ m in group 1; mean thickness: – 316.3 ± 159 µ m in group 2) while VA significantly increased in both groups (mean VA : 0.1 ± 0.21 in group 1; mean VA : 0.2 ± 0.17 in group 2). Pearson’s p was respectively – 0.2 in group 1 and – 0.3 in group 2. 5 patients of group 1, that showed a decrease of DME 100 µ m, underwent a 2nd JSTA injection. After 30 days macular thickness was significantly decreased in both groups (mean thickness : – 150.5 ± 162 µ m in group 1 and – 357.3 ± 149.4 µ m in group 2). The mean VA was 0.09 ± 0.10 in group 1 and 0.23 ± 0.17 in group 2. Pearson’s p was respectively 0.1 and 0.018. Conclusions: Both JSTA and IVTA injections can rapidly reduce DME and increase VA. IVTA appears to be more effective in short–term. Longer follow–up would enable the assessment of long–term effectiveness of both techniques.

Diabetic Macular Edema : Juxtascleral (JS) versus Intravitreal (IV) Triamcinolone Acetonide (TA) Injections

Miserocchi E
2005-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the short–term efficacy of juxtascleral triamcinolone acetonide (JSTA) versus intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injections on macular thickness measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and on visual acuity (VA) in eyes affected by diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to laser treatment. Methods: Eyes of diabetic patients affected by DME without vitreo–retinal interface anomalies are being randomized to one of the following two treatment groups: JSTA (group 1) and IVTA (group 2). All patients had normal intraocular pressure (IOP) and underwent previous laser treatment of posterior pole. At present are included in group 1 (JSTA) 9 eyes of 9 patients, and in group 2 (IVTA) 14 eyes of 14 patients. Controls (complete ophthalmological examination, OCT, fundus photographies) were scheduled at days 0, 7, 30, 90, 180. Fluorescein angiography was scheduled at days 0, 30, 90,180. The patients of group 1 that, at seven days control, showed a decrease of DME 100 µ m on OCT, underwent a second injection (JSTA). Results: Seven days after injection, macular thickness significantly decreased only in group 2 (mean thickness: – 47.5 ± 125 µ m in group 1; mean thickness: – 316.3 ± 159 µ m in group 2) while VA significantly increased in both groups (mean VA : 0.1 ± 0.21 in group 1; mean VA : 0.2 ± 0.17 in group 2). Pearson’s p was respectively – 0.2 in group 1 and – 0.3 in group 2. 5 patients of group 1, that showed a decrease of DME 100 µ m, underwent a 2nd JSTA injection. After 30 days macular thickness was significantly decreased in both groups (mean thickness : – 150.5 ± 162 µ m in group 1 and – 357.3 ± 149.4 µ m in group 2). The mean VA was 0.09 ± 0.10 in group 1 and 0.23 ± 0.17 in group 2. Pearson’s p was respectively 0.1 and 0.018. Conclusions: Both JSTA and IVTA injections can rapidly reduce DME and increase VA. IVTA appears to be more effective in short–term. Longer follow–up would enable the assessment of long–term effectiveness of both techniques.
2005
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/125978
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact