Background: The accuracy of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) in the pre-operative staging of prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of mpMRI to accurately predict PCa extra-prostatic extension (EPE) on a side-specific basis using a risk-stratified 5-point Likert scale. This study also aimed to assess the influence of mpMRI scan quality on diagnostic accuracy. Patients and Methods: We included 124 men who underwent robot-assisted RP (RARP) as part of the NeuroSAFE PROOF study at our centre. Three radiologists retrospectively reviewed mpMRI blinded to RP pathology and assigned a Likert score (1–5) for EPE on each side of the prostate. Each scan was also ascribed a Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score for assessing the quality of the mpMRI scan, where 1 represents the poorest and 5 represents the best diagnostic quality. Outcome measurements and statistical analyses: Diagnostic performance is presented for the binary classification of EPE, including 95% confidence intervals and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of 231 lobes from 121 men (mean age 56.9 years) were evaluated. Of these, 39 men (32.2%), or 43 lobes (18.6%), had EPE. A Likert score ≥3 had a sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), NPV, and PPV of 90.4%, 52.3%, 96%, and 29.9%, respectively, and the AUC was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77–0.86). The AUC was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64–0.88), 0.78 (0.72–0.84), and 0.92 (0.88–0.96) for biparametric scans, PI-QUAL 1–3, and PI-QUAL 4–5 scans, respectively. Conclusions: MRI can be used effectively by genitourinary radiologists to rule out EPE and help inform surgical planning for men undergoing RARP. EPE prediction was more reliable when the MRI scan was (a) multi-parametric and (b) of a higher image quality according to the PI-QUAL scoring system.

Negative mpMRI Rules Out Extra-Prostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer Before Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy / Dinneen, Eoin; Allen, Clare; Strange, Tom; Heffernan-Ho, Daniel; Banjeglav, Jelena; Lindsay, Jamie; Mulligan, John-Patrick; Briggs, Tim; Nathan, Senthil; Sridhar, Ashwin; Grierson, Jack; Haider, Aiman; Panayi, Christos; Patel, Dominic; Freeman, Alex; Aning, Jonathan; Persad, Raj; Ahmad, Imran; Dutto, Lorenzo; Oakley, Neil; Ambrosi, Alessandro; Parry, Tom; Kasivisvanathan, Veeru; Giganti, Francesco; Shaw, Greg; Punwani, Shonit. - In: DIAGNOSTICS. - ISSN 2075-4418. - 12:5(2022). [10.3390/diagnostics12051057]

Negative mpMRI Rules Out Extra-Prostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer Before Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Ambrosi, Alessandro;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Background: The accuracy of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) in the pre-operative staging of prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of mpMRI to accurately predict PCa extra-prostatic extension (EPE) on a side-specific basis using a risk-stratified 5-point Likert scale. This study also aimed to assess the influence of mpMRI scan quality on diagnostic accuracy. Patients and Methods: We included 124 men who underwent robot-assisted RP (RARP) as part of the NeuroSAFE PROOF study at our centre. Three radiologists retrospectively reviewed mpMRI blinded to RP pathology and assigned a Likert score (1–5) for EPE on each side of the prostate. Each scan was also ascribed a Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score for assessing the quality of the mpMRI scan, where 1 represents the poorest and 5 represents the best diagnostic quality. Outcome measurements and statistical analyses: Diagnostic performance is presented for the binary classification of EPE, including 95% confidence intervals and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of 231 lobes from 121 men (mean age 56.9 years) were evaluated. Of these, 39 men (32.2%), or 43 lobes (18.6%), had EPE. A Likert score ≥3 had a sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), NPV, and PPV of 90.4%, 52.3%, 96%, and 29.9%, respectively, and the AUC was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77–0.86). The AUC was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64–0.88), 0.78 (0.72–0.84), and 0.92 (0.88–0.96) for biparametric scans, PI-QUAL 1–3, and PI-QUAL 4–5 scans, respectively. Conclusions: MRI can be used effectively by genitourinary radiologists to rule out EPE and help inform surgical planning for men undergoing RARP. EPE prediction was more reliable when the MRI scan was (a) multi-parametric and (b) of a higher image quality according to the PI-QUAL scoring system.
2022
extra-prostatic extension; magnetic resonance imaging; radical prostatectomy; nerve-sparing; prostate cancer; staging; diagnostic accuracy
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
diagnostics-12-01057.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.66 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.66 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
preprints202201.0060.v1.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Submitted manuscript (manoscritto inviato all’editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 689.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
689.5 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/127935
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact