Stainless steel (SS) and carbon-coated (CC) stents were randomly compared in 347 patients (520 lesions). No differences were observed in in-hospital major adverse cardiac events: 2.8% in the CC group and 4.5% in the SS group (p = 0.286). The 6-month follow-up showed similar rates of binary restenosis (31.8% in the CC group vs 35.9% in the SS group; p = 0.448) and of cumulative major adverse cardiac events (30.5% in the CC group vs 32.7% in the SS group; p = 0.675). In unselected patients and lesions, carbon coating does not provide significant improvements over SS stents with the same design.
Comparison of diamond-like carbon-coated stents versus uncoated stainless steel stents in coronary artery disease / Airoldi, Flavio; Colombo, Antonio; Tavano, Davide; Stankovic, Goran; Klugmann, Silvio; Paolillo, Vito; Bonizzoni, Erminio; Briguori, Carlo; Carlino, Mauro; Montorfano, M; Liistro, Francesco; Castelli, Alfredo; Ferrari, Angela; Sgura, Fabio; Di Mario, Carlo. - In: THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 0002-9149. - (2004). [10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.10.048]
Comparison of diamond-like carbon-coated stents versus uncoated stainless steel stents in coronary artery disease
Montorfano M;
2004-01-01
Abstract
Stainless steel (SS) and carbon-coated (CC) stents were randomly compared in 347 patients (520 lesions). No differences were observed in in-hospital major adverse cardiac events: 2.8% in the CC group and 4.5% in the SS group (p = 0.286). The 6-month follow-up showed similar rates of binary restenosis (31.8% in the CC group vs 35.9% in the SS group; p = 0.448) and of cumulative major adverse cardiac events (30.5% in the CC group vs 32.7% in the SS group; p = 0.675). In unselected patients and lesions, carbon coating does not provide significant improvements over SS stents with the same design.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
