Background: Acute infection/inflammation increases the risk of acute vascular events (AVEs). Invasive dental treatments (IDTs) trigger short-term acute inflammation. Purpose: The aim of this work is to critically appraise the evidence linking IDTs and AVEs. Data Sources: Six bibliographical databases were searched up to 31 August 2021. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was performed. Study Selection: Intervention and observational studies reporting any AVEs following IDT were included. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted data and rated the quality of studies. Data were pooled using fixed-effect, inverse variance weights analysis. Risk of Bias: Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Handbook–Rob 2.0 for randomized controlled trials. Data Synthesis: In 3 out of 16 clinical studies, a total of 533,175 participants, 124,344 myocardial infarctions, and 327,804 ischaemic strokes were reported. Meta-analysis confirmed that IDT did not increase incidence ratios (IR) for combined vascular events either at 1-4 weeks (IR of 1.02, 95% CIs: 0.92 to 1.13) and at 5-8 weeks (IR of 1.04, 95% CIs: 0.97 to1.10) after treatment. Limitations: A high level of heterogeneity (study designs and time point assessments) was found. Conclusion: Patients who received IDT exhibited no substantial increase in vascular risk over 8 weeks post treatment.
Invasive dental treatment and acute vascular events: A systematic review and meta-analysis / Luthra, S.; Orlandi, M.; Leira, Y.; Bokre, D.; Marletta, D.; Rotundo, R.; Harden, S.; D'Aiuto, F.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY. - ISSN 0303-6979. - 49:5(2022), pp. 467-479. [10.1111/jcpe.13600]
Invasive dental treatment and acute vascular events: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Rotundo R.;
2022-01-01
Abstract
Background: Acute infection/inflammation increases the risk of acute vascular events (AVEs). Invasive dental treatments (IDTs) trigger short-term acute inflammation. Purpose: The aim of this work is to critically appraise the evidence linking IDTs and AVEs. Data Sources: Six bibliographical databases were searched up to 31 August 2021. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was performed. Study Selection: Intervention and observational studies reporting any AVEs following IDT were included. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted data and rated the quality of studies. Data were pooled using fixed-effect, inverse variance weights analysis. Risk of Bias: Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Handbook–Rob 2.0 for randomized controlled trials. Data Synthesis: In 3 out of 16 clinical studies, a total of 533,175 participants, 124,344 myocardial infarctions, and 327,804 ischaemic strokes were reported. Meta-analysis confirmed that IDT did not increase incidence ratios (IR) for combined vascular events either at 1-4 weeks (IR of 1.02, 95% CIs: 0.92 to 1.13) and at 5-8 weeks (IR of 1.04, 95% CIs: 0.97 to1.10) after treatment. Limitations: A high level of heterogeneity (study designs and time point assessments) was found. Conclusion: Patients who received IDT exhibited no substantial increase in vascular risk over 8 weeks post treatment.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
J Clinic Periodontology - 2022 - Luthra - Invasive dental treatment and acute vascular events A systematic review and.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.02 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.02 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.