PURPOSE. To compare the clinical outcomes of single, partial and complete fixed im-plant-supported prostheses immediately loaded (within 48 hours), early loaded at 6 we-eks, and conventionally loaded at 3 months (delayed loading). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-four patients (18 requiring single implants, 18 partial fixed prostheses, and 18 total fixed cross-arch prostheses) were randomised in equal numbers in two private practices to immediate loading (18 patients), early loading (18 patients), and conventional loading (18 patients) according to a parallel group design with three arms. To be immediately or early loaded, implants had to be inserted with a torque superior to 40 Ncm. Implants were initially loaded with provisional prostheses, replaced after 4 months by definitive ones. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failu-res, complications and peri-implant marginal bone levels. RESULTS. Two conventionally loaded patients rehabilitated with cross-arch fixed total prostheses dropped-out before 3-year post-loading follow-up. No implant failed. One early-loaded partial prosthesis had to be remade (P = 1.0). Three complications occurred in the immediately loaded group, two in the early-loaded and one in the conventionally loaded group with no statistically significant differences across groups (P = 0.861). Pe-ri-implant marginal bone loss was-0.04 ± 0.85 mm at immediately loaded implants,-0.01 ± 0.55 mm at early-loaded implants and 0.33 ± 0.36 mm at conventional loaded implants with no statistically significant differences between the three loading strategies (P=0.191). CONCLUSIONS. All loading strategies were highly successful, and no differences were observed in terms of implant survival and complications when implants were loaded immediately, early or conventionally.

IMMEDIATE, EARLY (6 WEEKS) AND DELAYED LOADING (3 MONTHS) OF SINGLE, PARTIAL AND FULL FIXED IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES: THREE-YEAR POST-LOADING DATA FROM A MULTICENTRE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL / Pistilli, R.; Mitsias, M.; Esposito, M.; Siormpas, K.; Sbricoli, L.; Buti, J.; Maghaireh, H.. - In: CLINICAL TRIALS IN DENTISTRY. - 1:1(2019), pp. 37-50. [10.36130/CTD.01.2019.04]

IMMEDIATE, EARLY (6 WEEKS) AND DELAYED LOADING (3 MONTHS) OF SINGLE, PARTIAL AND FULL FIXED IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES: THREE-YEAR POST-LOADING DATA FROM A MULTICENTRE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Esposito M.
;
2019-01-01

Abstract

PURPOSE. To compare the clinical outcomes of single, partial and complete fixed im-plant-supported prostheses immediately loaded (within 48 hours), early loaded at 6 we-eks, and conventionally loaded at 3 months (delayed loading). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-four patients (18 requiring single implants, 18 partial fixed prostheses, and 18 total fixed cross-arch prostheses) were randomised in equal numbers in two private practices to immediate loading (18 patients), early loading (18 patients), and conventional loading (18 patients) according to a parallel group design with three arms. To be immediately or early loaded, implants had to be inserted with a torque superior to 40 Ncm. Implants were initially loaded with provisional prostheses, replaced after 4 months by definitive ones. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failu-res, complications and peri-implant marginal bone levels. RESULTS. Two conventionally loaded patients rehabilitated with cross-arch fixed total prostheses dropped-out before 3-year post-loading follow-up. No implant failed. One early-loaded partial prosthesis had to be remade (P = 1.0). Three complications occurred in the immediately loaded group, two in the early-loaded and one in the conventionally loaded group with no statistically significant differences across groups (P = 0.861). Pe-ri-implant marginal bone loss was-0.04 ± 0.85 mm at immediately loaded implants,-0.01 ± 0.55 mm at early-loaded implants and 0.33 ± 0.36 mm at conventional loaded implants with no statistically significant differences between the three loading strategies (P=0.191). CONCLUSIONS. All loading strategies were highly successful, and no differences were observed in terms of implant survival and complications when implants were loaded immediately, early or conventionally.
2019
conventional loading
delayed loading
dental implants
early loading
immediate loading
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pistilli_2019;01(1)37-50.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 563.35 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
563.35 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/148096
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact