Background: this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of vaginal patch plastron (VPP) associated to anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF-A) with SSLF-A associated or not to the anterior colporrhaphy (AC) for cystocele treatment. Methods: single-center retrospective study in women with cystocele >= III stage submitted to surgery. The primary outcome was to compare objective and subjective cystocele relapse and reoperation rate at follow-up > 6 months. The secondary outcome was to describe peri- and postoperative complications and risk factors for cystocele objective relapse. Results: 75 women were submitted to SSLF-A and 61 women to VPP. VPP objective and subjective relapse (6.5%, 4/61 and 1.1%, 1/61) were lower than SSLF-A (26.7%, 20/75 and 20%, 15/75; p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively). SSLF-A had a higher reintervention rate, but not significantly (6.6%, 5/75 vs. 0%, 0/61; p = 0.06). Previous hysterectomy was a risk factor (HR 4; 1.3-12.1) while VPP was protective factor (HR 0.2; 0.1-0.9) for cystocele anatomical relapse. Postoperative buttock pain was more prevalent in VPP (57.4%, 35/75 vs. 34.7%, 26/61; p = 0.01). Conclusions: VPP is effective and safe for advanced cystocele treatment, with lower objective and subjective relapse rates in comparison to isolated SSLF-A or associated with the AC.
The Vaginal Patch Plastron Associated to the Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Treatment of Advanced Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse / Ruffolo, Alessandro Ferdinando; Lambert, Benjamin; Lallemant, Marine; Candiani, Massimo; Salvatore, Stefano; Cosson, Michel. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 11:22(2022). [10.3390/jcm11226684]
The Vaginal Patch Plastron Associated to the Anterior Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for the Treatment of Advanced Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
Ruffolo, Alessandro FerdinandoPrimo
;Candiani, Massimo;Salvatore, StefanoPenultimo
;
2022-01-01
Abstract
Background: this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of vaginal patch plastron (VPP) associated to anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF-A) with SSLF-A associated or not to the anterior colporrhaphy (AC) for cystocele treatment. Methods: single-center retrospective study in women with cystocele >= III stage submitted to surgery. The primary outcome was to compare objective and subjective cystocele relapse and reoperation rate at follow-up > 6 months. The secondary outcome was to describe peri- and postoperative complications and risk factors for cystocele objective relapse. Results: 75 women were submitted to SSLF-A and 61 women to VPP. VPP objective and subjective relapse (6.5%, 4/61 and 1.1%, 1/61) were lower than SSLF-A (26.7%, 20/75 and 20%, 15/75; p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively). SSLF-A had a higher reintervention rate, but not significantly (6.6%, 5/75 vs. 0%, 0/61; p = 0.06). Previous hysterectomy was a risk factor (HR 4; 1.3-12.1) while VPP was protective factor (HR 0.2; 0.1-0.9) for cystocele anatomical relapse. Postoperative buttock pain was more prevalent in VPP (57.4%, 35/75 vs. 34.7%, 26/61; p = 0.01). Conclusions: VPP is effective and safe for advanced cystocele treatment, with lower objective and subjective relapse rates in comparison to isolated SSLF-A or associated with the AC.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
jcm-11-06684.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
496.28 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
496.28 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.