Background: MBSR is a protocol, developed by John Kabat-Zinn, which fosters awareness by focusing on the present experience. Basing on scientific evidences, the numerous benefits of MBSR on diseases symptoms have been widely demonstrated.1–2 No studies have used MBSR on SSc. SSc is characterised by skin and systemic involvement: patients may complain for pain, psychological distress, concerns about disfigurement and reduced self-esteem.3 Thus, nurse’s role is pivotal not only in improving SSc patients global health and quality of life (QoL) but also in ameliorating their self-management strategies. Objectives: to assess the effect of MBSR protocol on sleep quality, QoL and perceived stress in SSc. Methods: 28 SSc patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to experimental group or to control group, and were assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of MBSR program for the experimental group compared to the control group. The following clinimetric outcomes were measured: QoL with SF-36, sleep quality with a NRS (0–10 range) and Likert scale on night awakenings, perceived stress scale (PSS) and Likert Scale on the way they cope with the stress. Data are presented as differences of Mean and Percentage (%), between and within the groups. Results: QoL presented an improvement for Mental Index Subscale for the experimental group (44.3 to 49.06) while the control group did not show any modification (40.73–40.75). For the impact of sleep quality, MBSR obtained an improvement from 53.3% at baseline to 26.7% at the end of the study: these patients still felt a bad sleep quality but were from far better in respect to controls that did not show any change. In MBSR group night awakenings were reduced from 73% to 60%, while in the control group were increased from 54% to 67%. Satisfaction of sleep quality was slightly improved in MBSR group (6.8 to 7.6) while controls did not experience any change (5.25 to 5.45). MBSR patients at baseline classified stress as a “high” health problem (53%) while after MBSR training only 20% kept the same answer. Conclusions: MBSR program, applied for the first time to SSc patients, showed a very good tolerability and a positive impact on aspects of life like sleep quality, stress perception and self-management strategies. The present study has limitations, nevertheless this is the first time that an alternative approach, such as MBSR, is used. Obviously, MBSR is a supportive approach which can provide to patients a self-management strategy against stress and disease perceptions and in the future it can be integrated to pharmacological therapy and clinical rehabilitation.

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) protocol applied to systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients: a pilot interventional study focused on nursing assessment and perceived stress / El Aoufy, 4. K.; Pollina, A.; Piccioli, F.; Pezzutto, A.; Matucci Cerinic, M.; Maddali Bongi, S.. - In: ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES. - ISSN 0003-4967. - (2018), pp. 1849-1849.

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) protocol applied to systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients: a pilot interventional study focused on nursing assessment and perceived stress

M. Matucci Cerinic;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Background: MBSR is a protocol, developed by John Kabat-Zinn, which fosters awareness by focusing on the present experience. Basing on scientific evidences, the numerous benefits of MBSR on diseases symptoms have been widely demonstrated.1–2 No studies have used MBSR on SSc. SSc is characterised by skin and systemic involvement: patients may complain for pain, psychological distress, concerns about disfigurement and reduced self-esteem.3 Thus, nurse’s role is pivotal not only in improving SSc patients global health and quality of life (QoL) but also in ameliorating their self-management strategies. Objectives: to assess the effect of MBSR protocol on sleep quality, QoL and perceived stress in SSc. Methods: 28 SSc patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to experimental group or to control group, and were assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of MBSR program for the experimental group compared to the control group. The following clinimetric outcomes were measured: QoL with SF-36, sleep quality with a NRS (0–10 range) and Likert scale on night awakenings, perceived stress scale (PSS) and Likert Scale on the way they cope with the stress. Data are presented as differences of Mean and Percentage (%), between and within the groups. Results: QoL presented an improvement for Mental Index Subscale for the experimental group (44.3 to 49.06) while the control group did not show any modification (40.73–40.75). For the impact of sleep quality, MBSR obtained an improvement from 53.3% at baseline to 26.7% at the end of the study: these patients still felt a bad sleep quality but were from far better in respect to controls that did not show any change. In MBSR group night awakenings were reduced from 73% to 60%, while in the control group were increased from 54% to 67%. Satisfaction of sleep quality was slightly improved in MBSR group (6.8 to 7.6) while controls did not experience any change (5.25 to 5.45). MBSR patients at baseline classified stress as a “high” health problem (53%) while after MBSR training only 20% kept the same answer. Conclusions: MBSR program, applied for the first time to SSc patients, showed a very good tolerability and a positive impact on aspects of life like sleep quality, stress perception and self-management strategies. The present study has limitations, nevertheless this is the first time that an alternative approach, such as MBSR, is used. Obviously, MBSR is a supportive approach which can provide to patients a self-management strategy against stress and disease perceptions and in the future it can be integrated to pharmacological therapy and clinical rehabilitation.
2018
Mindfulness based stress reductions
systemic sclerosis
SSc. MBSR
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/154181
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact