Purpose. To evaluate whether lymph node ratio (LNR) is a prognostic factor in patient receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pCRT) for rec- tal cancer. Patients and methods. A consecutive cohort of 308 patients (median age 62 years, M/F:202/106), who received pCRT from 2004 to 2007 within two Institutions, was evaluated. Clinical and histopathologi- cal data were prospectively recorded. Inclusion criterium was non metasta- tic mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer. LNR was defined as the num- ber of metastatic nodes divided by the number of total harvested nodes. A LNR of 0.18 was identified as the breakpoint for predicting overall sur- vival (OS). Based on this cut-off, patients were subdivided in: LNR-0 (ratio 0), LNR-1 (ratio: >0 to ≤ 0.18) and LNR-2 (>0.18). OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox’ model after stepwise selection. Results. In univariate analysis, variables that significantly affected OS were: distance of tumor from the anal verge (p=0.0003), type of resection (p=0.0253), pN (p=0.0402), total positive nodes (p=0.0023) and LNR (p=0.0052). In multivariate analysis, variables that independently affected OS were: distance of tumor from the anal verge with a RR (95%CI) of 0.834 (0.738-0.941) and p=0.003, and LNR with a RR (95% CI) of 0.421 (0.057-3.092) p=0.395 for LNR-1, and 2.413 (1.270-4.583) p=0.007 for LNR-2. Moreover, in 47 patients staged as pN1, LNR was able to discriminate two subgroups with a significantly (p=003) different prognosis: LNR-1 group (n=25, 5-year OS: 95%) and LNR-2 group (n=22, 5-yr OS: 53%). Conclusions. This study shows that, in patients receiving pCRT for rectal cancer, LNR is a strong prognostic factor, also able to discriminate subgroups with different prognosis in patients staged as pN1.

Lymph node ratio is a powerful prognostic factor in patients receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

AMBROSI , ALESSANDRO;
2009-01-01

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate whether lymph node ratio (LNR) is a prognostic factor in patient receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pCRT) for rec- tal cancer. Patients and methods. A consecutive cohort of 308 patients (median age 62 years, M/F:202/106), who received pCRT from 2004 to 2007 within two Institutions, was evaluated. Clinical and histopathologi- cal data were prospectively recorded. Inclusion criterium was non metasta- tic mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer. LNR was defined as the num- ber of metastatic nodes divided by the number of total harvested nodes. A LNR of 0.18 was identified as the breakpoint for predicting overall sur- vival (OS). Based on this cut-off, patients were subdivided in: LNR-0 (ratio 0), LNR-1 (ratio: >0 to ≤ 0.18) and LNR-2 (>0.18). OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox’ model after stepwise selection. Results. In univariate analysis, variables that significantly affected OS were: distance of tumor from the anal verge (p=0.0003), type of resection (p=0.0253), pN (p=0.0402), total positive nodes (p=0.0023) and LNR (p=0.0052). In multivariate analysis, variables that independently affected OS were: distance of tumor from the anal verge with a RR (95%CI) of 0.834 (0.738-0.941) and p=0.003, and LNR with a RR (95% CI) of 0.421 (0.057-3.092) p=0.395 for LNR-1, and 2.413 (1.270-4.583) p=0.007 for LNR-2. Moreover, in 47 patients staged as pN1, LNR was able to discriminate two subgroups with a significantly (p=003) different prognosis: LNR-1 group (n=25, 5-year OS: 95%) and LNR-2 group (n=22, 5-yr OS: 53%). Conclusions. This study shows that, in patients receiving pCRT for rectal cancer, LNR is a strong prognostic factor, also able to discriminate subgroups with different prognosis in patients staged as pN1.
2009
Inglese
62nd Annual Cancer Symposium
S. Pucciarelli, C. Capirci, A. Ambrosi, C. Mescoli, P. Toppan, M.L. Friso, S. Lonardi, A. Marchet, A. Ramin, M. Briarava
Society for Surgical Oncology
Springer
STATI UNITI D'AMERICA
62nd Annual Cancer Symposium - Society of Surgical Oncology
March 4–8, 2009
Phoenix, AZ
Contributo
16
1
82
82
1
https://link.springer.com/journal/10434/16/1/suppl/page/1
Esperti anonimi
Internazionale
none
Pucciarelli, S; Capirci, C; Ambrosi, Alessandro; Mescoli, C; Toppan, P; Friso, Ml; Lonardi, S; Marchet, A; Ramin, A; Briarava, M; Crepaldi, G; Rugge, ...espandi
273
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
13
4 Contributo in Atti di Convegno (Proceeding)::4.1 Contributo in Atti di convegno
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/16167
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact