Objective: To analyze the association of a surgeon's experience with postoperative outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomies (PDs) when stratified by Fistula Risk Score (FRS). Background: Centralization is now well-established for pancreatic surgery. Nevertheless, the benefits of individual surgeon's experience in high-volume settings remain undefined. Methods: Pancreatoduodenectomies performed by 82 surgeons across 18 international specialty institutions (median: 140 PD/year) were analyzed. Surgeon cumulative PD volume was linked with postoperative outcomes through multivariable models, adjusted for patient/operative characteristics and the FRS. Then, surgeon experience was also stratified by the 10, previously defined, most clinically impactful scenarios for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) development. Results: Of 8189 PDs, 18.7% suffered severe complications (Accordion≥3), 4.8% were reoperated upon and 2.2% expired. Although the most experienced surgeons (top-quartile; >525 career PDs) more often operated on riskier cases, their experience was significantly associated with declines in CR-POPF (P<0.001), severe complications (P=0.008), reoperations (P<0.001), and length of stay (LOS) (P<0.001) - accentuated even more in the most impactful FRS scenarios (2830 patients). Risk-adjusted models indicate male sex, increasing age, ASA class, and FRS, but not surgeon experience, as being associated with severe complications, failure-to-rescue, and mortality. Instead, upper-echelon experience demonstrates significant reductions in CR-POPF (OR 0.66), reoperations (OR 0.64), and LOS (OR 0.65) in moderate-to-high fistula risk circumstances (FRS≥3, 68% of cases). Conclusions: At specialty institutions, major morbidity, mortality, and failure-to-rescue are primarily associated with baseline patient characteristics, while cumulative surgical experience impacts pancreatic fistula occurrence and its attendant effects for most higher-risk pancreatoduodenectomies. These data also suggest an extended proficiency curve exists for this operation.

Extending Quality Improvement for Pancreatoduodenectomy Within the High-Volume Setting: The Experience Factor / Cannas, S.; Casciani, F.; Vollmer, C. M.; Fisher, W. E.; Van Buren, G.; Callery, M. P.; Kent, T. S.; Pratt, W. B.; Watkins, A. A.; House, M. G.; Beane, J. D.; Berger, A. C.; Wolfgang, C. L.; Javed, A. A.; Poruk, K. E.; Soares, K. C.; Valero, V.; Fernandez-Del Castillo, C.; Fong, Z. V.; Asbun, H. J.; Stauffer, J. A.; Bloomston, M. P.; Dilhoff, M. E.; Haverick, E. N.; Schmidt, C. R.; Christein, J. D.; Hollis, R. H.; Ball, C. G.; Dixon, E.; Hughes, S. J.; Drebin, J. A.; Ecker, B.; Lewis, R.; Trudeau, M. T.; Mcmillan, M.; Miller, B.; Puri, P.; Seykora, T.; Sprys, M. J.; Zureikat, A. H.; Kowalsky, S. J.; Behrman, S. W.; Bassi, C.; Maggino, L.; Malleo, G.; Salvia, R.; Savegnago, G.; Cinelli, L.; Falconi, M.; Partelli, S.; Dickson, E. J.; Jamieson, N. B.; Velu, L. K. P.; Salem, R. R.; Kunstman, J. W.. - In: ANNALS OF SURGERY. - ISSN 0003-4932. - 279:6(2024), pp. 1036-1045. [10.1097/SLA.0000000000006060]

Extending Quality Improvement for Pancreatoduodenectomy Within the High-Volume Setting: The Experience Factor

Cinelli L.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Falconi M.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Partelli S.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the association of a surgeon's experience with postoperative outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomies (PDs) when stratified by Fistula Risk Score (FRS). Background: Centralization is now well-established for pancreatic surgery. Nevertheless, the benefits of individual surgeon's experience in high-volume settings remain undefined. Methods: Pancreatoduodenectomies performed by 82 surgeons across 18 international specialty institutions (median: 140 PD/year) were analyzed. Surgeon cumulative PD volume was linked with postoperative outcomes through multivariable models, adjusted for patient/operative characteristics and the FRS. Then, surgeon experience was also stratified by the 10, previously defined, most clinically impactful scenarios for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) development. Results: Of 8189 PDs, 18.7% suffered severe complications (Accordion≥3), 4.8% were reoperated upon and 2.2% expired. Although the most experienced surgeons (top-quartile; >525 career PDs) more often operated on riskier cases, their experience was significantly associated with declines in CR-POPF (P<0.001), severe complications (P=0.008), reoperations (P<0.001), and length of stay (LOS) (P<0.001) - accentuated even more in the most impactful FRS scenarios (2830 patients). Risk-adjusted models indicate male sex, increasing age, ASA class, and FRS, but not surgeon experience, as being associated with severe complications, failure-to-rescue, and mortality. Instead, upper-echelon experience demonstrates significant reductions in CR-POPF (OR 0.66), reoperations (OR 0.64), and LOS (OR 0.65) in moderate-to-high fistula risk circumstances (FRS≥3, 68% of cases). Conclusions: At specialty institutions, major morbidity, mortality, and failure-to-rescue are primarily associated with baseline patient characteristics, while cumulative surgical experience impacts pancreatic fistula occurrence and its attendant effects for most higher-risk pancreatoduodenectomies. These data also suggest an extended proficiency curve exists for this operation.
2024
learning curve
pancreatoduodenectomy
postoperative complications
postoperative pancreatic fistula
proficiency curve
surgical experience
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
extending_quality_improvement_for.18.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 238.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
238.99 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/161696
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact