Background and aim: The correct time to perform an upper endoscopy is decisive in acutely GI bleeding patients. However, patients’ physical status may affect mortality. We speculated that the physical status and procedural time could be the principal factors accountable for death-risk. The primary aim was to verify the interaction between physical status and time to endoscopy on mortality; the secondary aim was to verify the interaction of the physical status and time to endoscopy on the length of stay (LOS). Methods: Consecutive patients admitted to 50 Italian hospitals were included. Clinical and endoscopic data were recorded. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed and the interaction of adjusted clinical physical status and time to endoscopy on mortality was calculated. Results: Complete data were available for 3.190 patients. The time frames did not interfere with outcomes but influenced LOS. Conversely, the ASA score correlated with mortality, LOS, need for transfusions and rebleeding risk. Conclusion: Endoscopy time should be tailored to the patient's physical. In our experience, ASA 1–2–3 patients can be safely submitted to endoscopy to reduce the LOS; on the contrary, keen attention should be paid to ASA4 patients, following the ‘not too early-not too late’ rule (12–24 h from admission).

The interaction of patients’ physical status and time to endoscopy on mortality risk in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A national prospective cohort study / Bucci, C.; Marmo, C.; Soncini, M.; Riccioni, M. E.; Laursen, S. B.; Gralnek, I. M.; Marmo, R.; GISED study, Group; Annese, V.. - In: DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. - ISSN 1590-8658. - 56:6(2024), pp. 1095-1100. [10.1016/j.dld.2023.11.024]

The interaction of patients’ physical status and time to endoscopy on mortality risk in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A national prospective cohort study

Annese V.
Membro del Collaboration Group
2024-01-01

Abstract

Background and aim: The correct time to perform an upper endoscopy is decisive in acutely GI bleeding patients. However, patients’ physical status may affect mortality. We speculated that the physical status and procedural time could be the principal factors accountable for death-risk. The primary aim was to verify the interaction between physical status and time to endoscopy on mortality; the secondary aim was to verify the interaction of the physical status and time to endoscopy on the length of stay (LOS). Methods: Consecutive patients admitted to 50 Italian hospitals were included. Clinical and endoscopic data were recorded. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed and the interaction of adjusted clinical physical status and time to endoscopy on mortality was calculated. Results: Complete data were available for 3.190 patients. The time frames did not interfere with outcomes but influenced LOS. Conversely, the ASA score correlated with mortality, LOS, need for transfusions and rebleeding risk. Conclusion: Endoscopy time should be tailored to the patient's physical. In our experience, ASA 1–2–3 patients can be safely submitted to endoscopy to reduce the LOS; on the contrary, keen attention should be paid to ASA4 patients, following the ‘not too early-not too late’ rule (12–24 h from admission).
2024
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
ASA score
Mortality
Physical status
Timing to endoscopy
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/166039
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact