Background: The provision of high-quality colonoscopy can be assessed by evaluating technical aspects of the procedure and, at individual center level, by comparing structural indicators and institutional policies for managing peri-procedural issues with guideline recommendations. Aim: To assess the colonoscopy quality (CQ) in Italy at center level. Methods: Gastroenterologists participating in a nationwide colonoscopy education initiative provided information on structural indicators of their centers and on institutional policies by answering 10 multiple-choice clinical scenarios. Practice variation across centers and compliance with guidelines were analyzed. Results: Data from 282 Italian centers were evaluated. Overall, a significant proportion of centers did not meet CQ standards as concerns endoscopy facilities and equipments (e.g., dedicated recovery room, dirty-to-clean path, reporting software). CQ assurance programs were implemented in only 25% of centers. Concerning peri-procedural issues, main discrepancies with guidelines were recorded in the underuse of split-dose preparation (routinely adopted by 18% of centers), the routine request of coagulation tests prior to colonoscopy (30%), the routine interruption of aspirin for polypectomy (18%), and the adoption of 3-year surveillance for low-risk adenoma (49%). Conclusions: Present survey shows a significant variation in the CQ of endoscopy centers in Italy on many items of colonoscopy practice that should be targeted for future interventions.

Pre- and post-procedural quality indicators for colonoscopy: A nationwide survey / Paggi, S.; Amato, A.; Anderloni, A.; Annese, V.; Barresi, L.; Buda, A.; Cesaro, P.; Di Giulio, E.; Gullotti, G.; Fabbri, C.; Fiori, G.; Fuccio, L.; Manno, M.; Musso, A.; Rondonotti, E.; Trovato, C.; Hassan, C.; Repici, A.; Radaelli, F.. - In: DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. - ISSN 1590-8658. - 48:7(2016), pp. 759-764. [10.1016/j.dld.2016.03.017]

Pre- and post-procedural quality indicators for colonoscopy: A nationwide survey

Amato A.;Annese V.;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Background: The provision of high-quality colonoscopy can be assessed by evaluating technical aspects of the procedure and, at individual center level, by comparing structural indicators and institutional policies for managing peri-procedural issues with guideline recommendations. Aim: To assess the colonoscopy quality (CQ) in Italy at center level. Methods: Gastroenterologists participating in a nationwide colonoscopy education initiative provided information on structural indicators of their centers and on institutional policies by answering 10 multiple-choice clinical scenarios. Practice variation across centers and compliance with guidelines were analyzed. Results: Data from 282 Italian centers were evaluated. Overall, a significant proportion of centers did not meet CQ standards as concerns endoscopy facilities and equipments (e.g., dedicated recovery room, dirty-to-clean path, reporting software). CQ assurance programs were implemented in only 25% of centers. Concerning peri-procedural issues, main discrepancies with guidelines were recorded in the underuse of split-dose preparation (routinely adopted by 18% of centers), the routine request of coagulation tests prior to colonoscopy (30%), the routine interruption of aspirin for polypectomy (18%), and the adoption of 3-year surveillance for low-risk adenoma (49%). Conclusions: Present survey shows a significant variation in the CQ of endoscopy centers in Italy on many items of colonoscopy practice that should be targeted for future interventions.
2016
Inglese
Elsevier B.V.
48
7
759
764
6
Pubblicato
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Colonoscopy
Practice guidelines
Quality
No
Pre- and post-procedural quality indicators for colonoscopy: A nationwide survey / Paggi, S.; Amato, A.; Anderloni, A.; Annese, V.; Barresi, L.; Buda, A.; Cesaro, P.; Di Giulio, E.; Gullotti, G.; Fabbri, C.; Fiori, G.; Fuccio, L.; Manno, M.; Musso, A.; Rondonotti, E.; Trovato, C.; Hassan, C.; Repici, A.; Radaelli, F.. - In: DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. - ISSN 1590-8658. - 48:7(2016), pp. 759-764. [10.1016/j.dld.2016.03.017]
none
19
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Paggi, S.; Amato, A.; Anderloni, A.; Annese, V.; Barresi, L.; Buda, A.; Cesaro, P.; Di Giulio, E.; Gullotti, G.; Fabbri, C.; Fiori, G.; Fuccio, L.; Ma...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/166117
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact