Aims: Many historical and recent reports showed that post-infarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) represents a life-threatening condition and the strategy to optimally manage it remains undefined. Therefore, disparate treatment policies among different centres with variable results are often described. We analysed data from European centres to capture the current clinical practice in VSR management. Methods and results: Thirty-nine centres belonging to eight European countries participated in a survey, filling a digital form of 38 questions from April to October 2022, to collect information about all the aspects of VSR treatment. Most centres encounter 1-5 VSR cases/year. Surgery remains the treatment of choice over percutaneous closure (71.8% vs. 28.2%). A delayed repair represents the preferred approach (87.2%). Haemodynamic conditions influence the management in almost all centres, although some try to achieve patients stabilization and delayed surgery even in cardiogenic shock. Although 33.3% of centres do not perform coronarography in unstable patients, revascularization approaches are widely variable. Most centres adopt mechanical circulatory support (MCS), mostly extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, especially pre-operatively to stabilize patients and achieve delayed repair. Post-operatively, such MCS are more often adopted in patients with ventricular dysfunction. Conclusion: In real-life, delayed surgery, regardless of the haemodynamic conditions, is the preferred strategy for VSR management in Europe. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is becoming the most frequently adopted MCS as bridge-to-operation. This survey provides a useful background to develop dedicated, prospective studies to strengthen the current evidence on VSR treatment and to help improving its currently unsatisfactory outcomes.

The current clinical practice for management of post-infarction ventricular septal rupture: a European survey / Ronco, Daniele; Ariza-Solé, Albert; Kowalewski, Mariusz; Matteucci, Matteo; Di Mauro, Michele; López-de-Sá, Esteban; Ranucci, Marco; Sionis, Alessandro; Bonaros, Nikolaos; De Bonis, Michele; Russo, Claudio Francesco; Uribarri, Aitor; Montero, Santiago; Fischlein, Theodor; Kowalówka, Adam; Naito, Shiho; Obadia, Jean-François; Martín-Asenjo, Roberto; Aboal, Jaime; Thielmann, Matthias; Simon, Caterina; Andrea-Riba, Rut; Parra, Carolina; Folliguet, Thierry; Martínez-Sellés, Manuel; Sanmartín Fernández, Marcelo; Al-Attar, Nawwar; Viana Tejedor, Ana; Serraino, Giuseppe Filiberto; Burgos Palacios, Virginia; Boeken, Udo; Raposeiras Roubin, Sergio; Solla Buceta, Miguel Antonio; Sánchez Fernández, Pedro Luis; Scrofani, Roberto; Pastor Báez, Gemma; Jorge Pérez, Pablo; Actis Dato, Guglielmo; Garcia-Rubira, Juan Carlos; De Gea Garcia, Jose H; Massimi, Giulio; Musazzi, Andrea; Lorusso, Roberto. - In: EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL OPEN. - ISSN 2752-4191. - 3:5(2023). [10.1093/ehjopen/oead091]

The current clinical practice for management of post-infarction ventricular septal rupture: a European survey

De Bonis, Michele;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Aims: Many historical and recent reports showed that post-infarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) represents a life-threatening condition and the strategy to optimally manage it remains undefined. Therefore, disparate treatment policies among different centres with variable results are often described. We analysed data from European centres to capture the current clinical practice in VSR management. Methods and results: Thirty-nine centres belonging to eight European countries participated in a survey, filling a digital form of 38 questions from April to October 2022, to collect information about all the aspects of VSR treatment. Most centres encounter 1-5 VSR cases/year. Surgery remains the treatment of choice over percutaneous closure (71.8% vs. 28.2%). A delayed repair represents the preferred approach (87.2%). Haemodynamic conditions influence the management in almost all centres, although some try to achieve patients stabilization and delayed surgery even in cardiogenic shock. Although 33.3% of centres do not perform coronarography in unstable patients, revascularization approaches are widely variable. Most centres adopt mechanical circulatory support (MCS), mostly extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, especially pre-operatively to stabilize patients and achieve delayed repair. Post-operatively, such MCS are more often adopted in patients with ventricular dysfunction. Conclusion: In real-life, delayed surgery, regardless of the haemodynamic conditions, is the preferred strategy for VSR management in Europe. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is becoming the most frequently adopted MCS as bridge-to-operation. This survey provides a useful background to develop dedicated, prospective studies to strengthen the current evidence on VSR treatment and to help improving its currently unsatisfactory outcomes.
2023
Acute myocardial infarction
Cardiogenic shock
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Mechanical circulatory support
Mechanical complication
Ventricular septal rupture
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
oead091.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 633.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
633.87 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/169356
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact