BACKGROUND: Baseline steroids before ICI have been associated with poor outcomes, particularly when introduced due to cancer symptoms.METHODS: Retrospective analysis of advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICI. We collected the use of intercurrent steroids (≥10 mg of prednisone-equivalent) within the first eight weeks of ICI. We correlated steroid use with patient outcomes according to the indications.RESULTS: 413 patients received ICI, 299 were steroids-naïve at baseline. A total of 49 patients received intercurrent steroids (16%), of whom 38 for cancer-related symptoms and 11 for other indications, such as immune-related events. Overall, median (m) progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.9 months (mo.) [95% CI, 1.8-2.4] and overall survival (OS) 10 mo. [95% CI, 8.1-12.9]. Intercurrent steroids under ICI correlated with a shorter PFS/OS (1.3 and 2.3 mo. respectively, both p < 0.0001). Intercurrent steroids for cancer-related symptoms correlated with poorest mPFS [1.1 mo.; 95% CI, 0.9-1.5] and mOS [1.9 mo.; 95%CI, 1.5-2.4; p < 0.0001)]. No mOS and mPFS differences were found between cancer-unrelated-steroid group and no-steroid group. Steroid use for cancer-related symptoms was an independent prognostic factor for poor PFS [HR 2.64; 95% CI, 1.2-5.6] and OS [HR 4.53; 95% CI, 1.8-11.1], both p < 0.0001.CONCLUSION: Intercurrent steroids during ICI had no detrimental prognostic impact if the indication was unrelated to cancer symptoms.

Impact of Intercurrent Introduction of Steroids on Clinical Outcomes in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients under Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) / De Giglio, Andrea; Mezquita, Laura; Auclin, Edouard; Blanc-Durand, Félix; Riudavets, Mariona; Caramella, Caroline; Martinez, Gala; Benitez Jose, Carlos; Martín-Romano, Patricia; El-Amarti, Lamiae; Hendriks, Lizza; Ferrara, R; Naltet, Charles; Lavaud, Pernelle; Gazzah, Anas; Adam, Julien; Planchard, David; Chaput, Nathalie; Besse, Benjamin. - In: CANCERS. - ISSN 2072-6694. - 9:5(2020), pp. 1143-1161. [10.3390/cancers12102827]

Impact of Intercurrent Introduction of Steroids on Clinical Outcomes in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients under Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI)

FERRARA R;
2020-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Baseline steroids before ICI have been associated with poor outcomes, particularly when introduced due to cancer symptoms.METHODS: Retrospective analysis of advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICI. We collected the use of intercurrent steroids (≥10 mg of prednisone-equivalent) within the first eight weeks of ICI. We correlated steroid use with patient outcomes according to the indications.RESULTS: 413 patients received ICI, 299 were steroids-naïve at baseline. A total of 49 patients received intercurrent steroids (16%), of whom 38 for cancer-related symptoms and 11 for other indications, such as immune-related events. Overall, median (m) progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.9 months (mo.) [95% CI, 1.8-2.4] and overall survival (OS) 10 mo. [95% CI, 8.1-12.9]. Intercurrent steroids under ICI correlated with a shorter PFS/OS (1.3 and 2.3 mo. respectively, both p < 0.0001). Intercurrent steroids for cancer-related symptoms correlated with poorest mPFS [1.1 mo.; 95% CI, 0.9-1.5] and mOS [1.9 mo.; 95%CI, 1.5-2.4; p < 0.0001)]. No mOS and mPFS differences were found between cancer-unrelated-steroid group and no-steroid group. Steroid use for cancer-related symptoms was an independent prognostic factor for poor PFS [HR 2.64; 95% CI, 1.2-5.6] and OS [HR 4.53; 95% CI, 1.8-11.1], both p < 0.0001.CONCLUSION: Intercurrent steroids during ICI had no detrimental prognostic impact if the indication was unrelated to cancer symptoms.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/176292
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 42
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 40
social impact