This paper discusses Taraborrelli’s hypothesis that a cosmopolitan longing pervades Arendt’sthought, wondering if a cosmopolitanism without uprootedness is possible. This scope is pursuedthrough Arendt’s themes of the “right to have rights” and the connection between power, law,and world. The first chapter examines the syntagm “right to have rights”, showing the distinctlevels on which the first right - the only human right – lies, beyond and over the rights of thecitizens. The second chapter discusses Rancière’s and Balibar’s reading of Arendt’s right to haverights; thus, it demonstrates that, while the two authors grasp the relevance of political action,they downplay the two levels where the only human right and the rights of the citizens situate.The third chapter locates on the degree of the rights of the citizen and studies Arendt’s idea ofthe implication between civil and political rights through the magnifying lens of the foundation.Lastly, the article shows that Arendt appeals to international law as a worldly federation of conciliar states, while she invokes the cosmopolitan law for the guarantee of the only human rightagainst the only crime against the mankind: the cosmopolitical domain lies outside the spatialorganization of the people
Potere, legge, mondo: un'idea di cosmopolitismo attraverso una lettura arendtiana / Konderak, Letizia. - In: ETICA & POLITICA. - ISSN 1825-5167. - XXV:1(2023), pp. 41-61. [10.13137/1825-5167/34664]
Potere, legge, mondo: un'idea di cosmopolitismo attraverso una lettura arendtiana
Letizia Konderak
2023-01-01
Abstract
This paper discusses Taraborrelli’s hypothesis that a cosmopolitan longing pervades Arendt’sthought, wondering if a cosmopolitanism without uprootedness is possible. This scope is pursuedthrough Arendt’s themes of the “right to have rights” and the connection between power, law,and world. The first chapter examines the syntagm “right to have rights”, showing the distinctlevels on which the first right - the only human right – lies, beyond and over the rights of thecitizens. The second chapter discusses Rancière’s and Balibar’s reading of Arendt’s right to haverights; thus, it demonstrates that, while the two authors grasp the relevance of political action,they downplay the two levels where the only human right and the rights of the citizens situate.The third chapter locates on the degree of the rights of the citizen and studies Arendt’s idea ofthe implication between civil and political rights through the magnifying lens of the foundation.Lastly, the article shows that Arendt appeals to international law as a worldly federation of conciliar states, while she invokes the cosmopolitan law for the guarantee of the only human rightagainst the only crime against the mankind: the cosmopolitical domain lies outside the spatialorganization of the peopleFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
KONDERAK.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
180.84 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
180.84 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.