Background: The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, used for predicting outcomes after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resection, does not directly capture liver cell damage or biliary obstruction. Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), which reflects hepatic oxidative stress and inflammation, may complement the ALBI score. We sought to develop the ALBI-GGT score, a composite prognostic tool, and evaluate its performance to predict long-term outcomes among patients undergoing HCC resection. Methods: Patients undergoing curative-intent HCC resection (2000–2023) were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. The cohort was divided into training (65%) and testing cohorts (35%). Multivariable Cox analysis examined the association of ALBI-GGT score with overall survival (OS). Results: Among 759 patients, the median ALBI score was −2.78 (−3.02 to −2.48), and the median GGT was 55.0 U/L (31.0–93.0). On multivariable analysis, ALBI score (hazard ratio [HR], 1.473 [1.112–1.950]; P =.007) and GGT (HR, 1.007 [1.004–1.010]; P <.001) were predictors of overall mortality, alongside tumor burden score (HR, 1.051 [1.015–1.090]; P =.006) and American Society of Anesthesiologists class >2 (HR, 1.473 [1.005–2.161]; P =.047). There was a near-linear correlation between increasing ALBI scores and GGT and higher hazards of death. The ALBI-GGT score demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy in the testing set (concordance index, 0.68 [0.58–0.72]), outperforming the ALBI score (0.62 [0.56–0.69]) and GGT (0.65 [0.58–0.72]). The ALBI-GGT achieved the lowest Akaike and Bayesian information criteria. Time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) analysis demonstrated consistent superiority over 0 to 60 months. At 1-, 3-, and 5-years, the ALBI-GGT score had AUCs of 0.782, 0.725, and 0.688, respectively, outperforming ALBI score and GGT. The ALBI-GGT score was able to stratify patients into distinct prognostic groups (5-year OS, low ALBI-GGT [85.0%] vs intermediate ALBI-GGT [65.8%] vs high ALBI-GGT [56.8%]; P <.001). Conclusion: ALBI score alone may be insufficient to prognostically stratify patients with HCC. Combining ALBI score with GGT was a superior tool to stratify patients relative to long-term survival.
Development and validation of the albumin-bilirubin gamma-glutamyl transferase score for enhanced prognostic accuracy after hepatocellular carcinoma resection / Akabane, M.; Kawashima, J.; Altaf, A.; Woldesenbet, S.; Cauchy, F.; Aucejo, F.; Popescu, I.; Kitago, M.; Martel, G.; Ratti, F.; Aldrighetti, L.; Poultsides, G. A.; Imaoka, Y.; Ruzzenente, A.; Endo, I.; Gleisner, A.; Marques, H. P.; Lam, V.; Hugh, T.; Bhimani, N.; Shen, F.; Pawlik, T. M.. - In: JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY. - ISSN 1091-255X. - 29:4(2025). [10.1016/j.gassur.2025.101984]
Development and validation of the albumin-bilirubin gamma-glutamyl transferase score for enhanced prognostic accuracy after hepatocellular carcinoma resection
Ratti F.;Aldrighetti L.;
2025-01-01
Abstract
Background: The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, used for predicting outcomes after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resection, does not directly capture liver cell damage or biliary obstruction. Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), which reflects hepatic oxidative stress and inflammation, may complement the ALBI score. We sought to develop the ALBI-GGT score, a composite prognostic tool, and evaluate its performance to predict long-term outcomes among patients undergoing HCC resection. Methods: Patients undergoing curative-intent HCC resection (2000–2023) were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. The cohort was divided into training (65%) and testing cohorts (35%). Multivariable Cox analysis examined the association of ALBI-GGT score with overall survival (OS). Results: Among 759 patients, the median ALBI score was −2.78 (−3.02 to −2.48), and the median GGT was 55.0 U/L (31.0–93.0). On multivariable analysis, ALBI score (hazard ratio [HR], 1.473 [1.112–1.950]; P =.007) and GGT (HR, 1.007 [1.004–1.010]; P <.001) were predictors of overall mortality, alongside tumor burden score (HR, 1.051 [1.015–1.090]; P =.006) and American Society of Anesthesiologists class >2 (HR, 1.473 [1.005–2.161]; P =.047). There was a near-linear correlation between increasing ALBI scores and GGT and higher hazards of death. The ALBI-GGT score demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy in the testing set (concordance index, 0.68 [0.58–0.72]), outperforming the ALBI score (0.62 [0.56–0.69]) and GGT (0.65 [0.58–0.72]). The ALBI-GGT achieved the lowest Akaike and Bayesian information criteria. Time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) analysis demonstrated consistent superiority over 0 to 60 months. At 1-, 3-, and 5-years, the ALBI-GGT score had AUCs of 0.782, 0.725, and 0.688, respectively, outperforming ALBI score and GGT. The ALBI-GGT score was able to stratify patients into distinct prognostic groups (5-year OS, low ALBI-GGT [85.0%] vs intermediate ALBI-GGT [65.8%] vs high ALBI-GGT [56.8%]; P <.001). Conclusion: ALBI score alone may be insufficient to prognostically stratify patients with HCC. Combining ALBI score with GGT was a superior tool to stratify patients relative to long-term survival.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S1091255X25000435-main.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
1.32 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.32 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


