Background/Objectives: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a prevalent skin cancer with increasing incidence worldwide. High-risk cSCCs often require extensive surgical treatments, which can impair anatomical function and aesthetics. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as cemiplimab and pembrolizumab, has emerged as a promising approach to enhance tumor control and surgical outcomes. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in high-risk cSCC. Methods: A systematic review and proportional meta-analysis focusing on neoadjuvant immunotherapy for cSCC were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE and Scopus databases were searched up to September 2024 using predefined terms. Recorded findings were pathological/radiological response, 1-year disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. Statistical analysis included fixed- and random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed using Cochran’s Q statistic and the I² index. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled pathologic response rate was 72.2% (95% CI: 57.7–84.6), and the radiological response rate was 54.8% (95% CI: 38.6–70.5), with moderate heterogeneity. Pooled 1-year DFS and OS proportions were 91.1% (95% CI: 85.0–95.3) and 90.6% (95% CI: 85.1–95.0), respectively, demonstrating homogeneity across studies. Adverse events were consistent with previously reported immune-related toxicities, with rare severe events. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic strategy for high-risk cSCC, with high pathologic response rates and high survival outcomes. However, standardization of treatment protocols and further trials are needed to optimize efficacy, ensure safety, and assess long-term benefits.
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Literature Review and State of the Art / Spadafora, M.; Paganelli, A.; Raucci, M.; Kaleci, S.; Peris, K.; Guida, S.; Pellacani, G.; Longo, C.. - In: CANCERS. - ISSN 2072-6694. - 17:4(2025). [10.3390/cancers17040637]
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Literature Review and State of the Art
Guida S.;
2025-01-01
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a prevalent skin cancer with increasing incidence worldwide. High-risk cSCCs often require extensive surgical treatments, which can impair anatomical function and aesthetics. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as cemiplimab and pembrolizumab, has emerged as a promising approach to enhance tumor control and surgical outcomes. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in high-risk cSCC. Methods: A systematic review and proportional meta-analysis focusing on neoadjuvant immunotherapy for cSCC were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE and Scopus databases were searched up to September 2024 using predefined terms. Recorded findings were pathological/radiological response, 1-year disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. Statistical analysis included fixed- and random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed using Cochran’s Q statistic and the I² index. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled pathologic response rate was 72.2% (95% CI: 57.7–84.6), and the radiological response rate was 54.8% (95% CI: 38.6–70.5), with moderate heterogeneity. Pooled 1-year DFS and OS proportions were 91.1% (95% CI: 85.0–95.3) and 90.6% (95% CI: 85.1–95.0), respectively, demonstrating homogeneity across studies. Adverse events were consistent with previously reported immune-related toxicities, with rare severe events. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic strategy for high-risk cSCC, with high pathologic response rates and high survival outcomes. However, standardization of treatment protocols and further trials are needed to optimize efficacy, ensure safety, and assess long-term benefits.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
cancers-17-00637.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Submitted manuscript (manoscritto inviato all’editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.22 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.22 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


