Objective: To provide gestational-age (GA)-specific reference ranges for mean uterine artery (UtA) pulsatility index (PI) based on longitudinal data assessment throughout pregnancy. Methods: This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study of singleton low-risk pregnancies with adequate health and nutritional status at the time of enrolment and without fetal anomaly, receiving prenatal care between January 2018 and July 2021 at the Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit of IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. Women were recruited at ≤ 12 + 6 weeks' gestation and underwent serial standardized ultrasound monitoring, including UtA-PI measurement, by experienced certified operators until delivery. Association of UtA-PI with GA was modeled with fractional polynomial regression. Equations for mean ± SD of the estimated curves were calculated, as well as GA-specific reference charts of centiles for UtA-PI from 10 + 0 to 39 + 0 gestational weeks. Results: We included 476 healthy, low-risk pregnant women and a total of 2045 ultrasound scans (median, 4 (range, 3–9) per patient) were available for analysis. Mean UtA-PI was 1.84 ± 0.55, 1.07 ± 0.38 and 0.78 ± 0.23 in the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy, respectively. Goodness-of-fit assessment revealed that second-degree smoothing was the most accurate fractional polynomial for describing the course of UtA-PI throughout gestation; therefore, it was modeled in a multilevel framework for the construction of UtA-PI curves. We observed a rapid and substantial decrease in mean UtA-PI before 16 weeks, with subsequent smoother decrement of the slope and more stable values from 20 until 39 weeks. The 3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th and 97th centiles according to GA for UtA-PI are provided, as well as equations to allow calculation of any value as a centile. Conclusions: UtA-PI shows a progressive non-linear decrease throughout pregnancy. The new reference ranges for GA-specific mean UtA-PI constructed using rigorous methodology may have a better performance compared with previous models for screening for placenta-associated diseases in the early stages of pregnancy and for evaluating the potential risk for pregnancy-induced hypertension and/or small-for-gestational age later in pregnancy. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Reference ranges of uterine artery pulsatility index from first to third trimester based on serial Doppler measurements: longitudinal cohort study / Cavoretto, P. I.; Salmeri, N.; Candiani, M.; Farina, A.. - In: ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY. - ISSN 0960-7692. - 61:4(2022), pp. 474-480. [10.1002/uog.26092]

Reference ranges of uterine artery pulsatility index from first to third trimester based on serial Doppler measurements: longitudinal cohort study

Cavoretto P. I.
Primo
;
Salmeri N.
Secondo
;
Candiani M.
Penultimo
;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Objective: To provide gestational-age (GA)-specific reference ranges for mean uterine artery (UtA) pulsatility index (PI) based on longitudinal data assessment throughout pregnancy. Methods: This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study of singleton low-risk pregnancies with adequate health and nutritional status at the time of enrolment and without fetal anomaly, receiving prenatal care between January 2018 and July 2021 at the Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit of IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. Women were recruited at ≤ 12 + 6 weeks' gestation and underwent serial standardized ultrasound monitoring, including UtA-PI measurement, by experienced certified operators until delivery. Association of UtA-PI with GA was modeled with fractional polynomial regression. Equations for mean ± SD of the estimated curves were calculated, as well as GA-specific reference charts of centiles for UtA-PI from 10 + 0 to 39 + 0 gestational weeks. Results: We included 476 healthy, low-risk pregnant women and a total of 2045 ultrasound scans (median, 4 (range, 3–9) per patient) were available for analysis. Mean UtA-PI was 1.84 ± 0.55, 1.07 ± 0.38 and 0.78 ± 0.23 in the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy, respectively. Goodness-of-fit assessment revealed that second-degree smoothing was the most accurate fractional polynomial for describing the course of UtA-PI throughout gestation; therefore, it was modeled in a multilevel framework for the construction of UtA-PI curves. We observed a rapid and substantial decrease in mean UtA-PI before 16 weeks, with subsequent smoother decrement of the slope and more stable values from 20 until 39 weeks. The 3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th and 97th centiles according to GA for UtA-PI are provided, as well as equations to allow calculation of any value as a centile. Conclusions: UtA-PI shows a progressive non-linear decrease throughout pregnancy. The new reference ranges for GA-specific mean UtA-PI constructed using rigorous methodology may have a better performance compared with previous models for screening for placenta-associated diseases in the early stages of pregnancy and for evaluating the potential risk for pregnancy-induced hypertension and/or small-for-gestational age later in pregnancy. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
2022
Doppler
longitudinal study
low-risk pregnancy
maternal–fetal wellbeing
placentation
pulsatility index
reference range
uterine artery
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ultrasound in Obstet Gyne - 2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 299.77 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
299.77 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/188520
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
social impact