Research question: Is postnatal growth of singletons aged 12 months born after vitrified–warmed blastocyst transfer (frozen embryo transfer [FET]) different from children born after fresh blastocyst transfer? Design: A retrospective cohort study conducted at a single university-affiliated obstetrics and fertility centre between 2014 and 2016. Women who underwent fresh transfer or FET at blastocyst stage and obtained a singleton live birth were included. Propensity score inverse probability weighting was used to balance baseline maternal characteristics between fresh and FET cycles. Results: Of the 382 women with singleton live births, 124 underwent a fresh blastocyst transfer and 258 underwent a FET. Significantly higher birth weight and length z-scores were observed after FET (P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively) compared with the fresh transfer group. At 12 months of age, the fresh and FET groups showed no significant effect on the weight z-score, but the FET was associated with a higher height z-score (P = 0.001) compared with fresh blastocyst transfer. The comparison between males and females from the same study group showed higher birth weight z-score for males in the FET group (P < 0.001). During the first 12 months, however, males in the FET group showed a slower growth trajectory in terms of weight (P = 0.007). Conclusions: At 12 months of postnatal life, an increased height and sex-dependent differences in growth trajectories were observed in singletons born after FET compared with those born after fresh embryo transfer.

The effect of vitrified–warmed blastocyst transfer on postnatal growth: a 1-year follow-up questionnaire study / Alteri, A., Campo, G., Pagliardini, L., Privitera, L., Cavoretto, P.I., Candiani, M., Papaleo, E., Vigano, P.. - In: REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE. - ISSN 1472-6483. - 44:5(2022), pp. 907-914. [10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.12.018]

The effect of vitrified–warmed blastocyst transfer on postnatal growth: a 1-year follow-up questionnaire study

Campo G.
Secondo
;
Cavoretto P. I.;Candiani M.;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Research question: Is postnatal growth of singletons aged 12 months born after vitrified–warmed blastocyst transfer (frozen embryo transfer [FET]) different from children born after fresh blastocyst transfer? Design: A retrospective cohort study conducted at a single university-affiliated obstetrics and fertility centre between 2014 and 2016. Women who underwent fresh transfer or FET at blastocyst stage and obtained a singleton live birth were included. Propensity score inverse probability weighting was used to balance baseline maternal characteristics between fresh and FET cycles. Results: Of the 382 women with singleton live births, 124 underwent a fresh blastocyst transfer and 258 underwent a FET. Significantly higher birth weight and length z-scores were observed after FET (P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively) compared with the fresh transfer group. At 12 months of age, the fresh and FET groups showed no significant effect on the weight z-score, but the FET was associated with a higher height z-score (P = 0.001) compared with fresh blastocyst transfer. The comparison between males and females from the same study group showed higher birth weight z-score for males in the FET group (P < 0.001). During the first 12 months, however, males in the FET group showed a slower growth trajectory in terms of weight (P = 0.007). Conclusions: At 12 months of postnatal life, an increased height and sex-dependent differences in growth trajectories were observed in singletons born after FET compared with those born after fresh embryo transfer.
2022
Inglese
Elsevier Ltd
44
5
907
914
8
Pubblicato
Esperti anonimi
Internazionale
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Blastocyst
Medically assisted reproduction
Postnatal growth
Vitrification
Vitrified–warmed blastocyst transfer
No
The effect of vitrified–warmed blastocyst transfer on postnatal growth: a 1-year follow-up questionnaire study / Alteri, A., Campo, G., Pagliardini, L., Privitera, L., Cavoretto, P.I., Candiani, M., Papaleo, E., Vigano, P.. - In: REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE. - ISSN 1472-6483. - 44:5(2022), pp. 907-914. [10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.12.018]
reserved
8
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Alteri, A.; Campo, G.; Pagliardini, L.; Privitera, L.; Cavoretto, P. I.; Candiani, M.; Papaleo, E.; Vigano, P.
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PIIS1472648322000335.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 532.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
532.63 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/188744
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact