Elisabetta Lalumera and Sarah Songhorian discuss Philip Kitcher’s Moral Progress. Lalumera focuses on the notion of «ideal conversation» as central to Kitcher’s democratic contractualism, raising concerns about the criteria for inclusion, the role of expertise, and the tension between inclusivity and the requirement for virtuous participants. Songhorian explores the interplay between individual and social dimensions of moral progress, highlighting Kitcher’s rejection of teleological or discovery-based conceptions in favor of a pragmatic, problem-solving approach.

The Experts, the Virtuous and the Wounded. Who Should Take Part in an «Ideal Conversation»? / Lalumera, E.; Songhorian, S.. - In: IRIDE. - ISSN 1122-7893. - 38:1(2025), pp. 143-156. [10.1414/117286]

The Experts, the Virtuous and the Wounded. Who Should Take Part in an «Ideal Conversation»?

Songhorian S.
2025-01-01

Abstract

Elisabetta Lalumera and Sarah Songhorian discuss Philip Kitcher’s Moral Progress. Lalumera focuses on the notion of «ideal conversation» as central to Kitcher’s democratic contractualism, raising concerns about the criteria for inclusion, the role of expertise, and the tension between inclusivity and the requirement for virtuous participants. Songhorian explores the interplay between individual and social dimensions of moral progress, highlighting Kitcher’s rejection of teleological or discovery-based conceptions in favor of a pragmatic, problem-solving approach.
2025
Moral Progress, Democratic Contractualism, Ideal Conversation, Empathy, Procedural Ethics
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
11_Discussione_Lalumera-Songhorian.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 121.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
121.87 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/191640
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact