Background/Objectives: Adult vaccination remains suboptimal, particularly among older adults and individuals with chronic conditions. Hospitals represent a strategic setting for improving vaccination coverage among these high-risk populations. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated hospital-based interventions aimed at enhancing vaccine uptake in adults aged ≥60 years or 18–64 years with at-risk medical conditions. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Searches in PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus identified studies published in the last 10 years evaluating hospital-based interventions reporting vaccination uptake. The risk of bias was assessed using validated tools (NOS, RoB 2, ROBINS-I, QI-MQCS). A meta-analysis was conducted for categories with ≥3 eligible studies reporting pre- and post-intervention vaccination coverage in the same population. Results: We included 44 studies. Multi-component strategies (n = 21) showed the most consistent results (e.g., pneumococcal uptake from 2.2% to 43.4%, p < 0.001). Reminder-based interventions (n = 4) achieved influenza coverage increases from 31.0% to 68.0% and a COVID-19 booster uptake boost of +38% after SMS reminders. Educational strategies (n = 11) varied in effectiveness, with one study reporting influenza coverage rising from 1.6% to 12.2% (+662.5%, OR 8.86, p < 0.01). Standing order protocols increased pneumococcal vaccination from 10% to 60% in high-risk adults. Hospital-based catch-up programs improved DTaP-IPV uptake from 56.2% to 80.8% (p < 0.001). For patient education, the pooled OR was 2.11 (95% CI: 1.96–2.27; p < 0.001, I2 = 97.2%) under a fixed-effects model, and 2.47 (95% CI: 1.53–3.98; p < 0.001) under a random-effects model. For multi-component strategies, the OR was 2.39 (95% CI: 2.33–2.44; p < 0.001, I2 = 98.0%) with fixed effects, and 3.12 (95% CI: 2.49–3.92; p < 0.001) with random effects. No publication bias was detected. Conclusions: Hospital-based interventions, particularly those using multi-component approaches, effectively improve vaccine coverage in older and high-risk adults. Embedding vaccination into routine hospital care offers a scalable opportunity to reduce disparities and enhance population-level protection. Future policies should prioritize the institutional integration of such strategies to support healthy aging and vaccine equity.

Improving Vaccine Coverage Among Older Adults and High-Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hospital-Based Strategies / Pennisi, F; Borlini, S; Cuciniello, R; D'Amelio, Ac; Calabretta, R; Pinto, A; Signorelli, C. - In: HEALTHCARE. - ISSN 2227-9032. - 13:14(2025). [10.3390/healthcare13141667]

Improving Vaccine Coverage Among Older Adults and High-Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hospital-Based Strategies

Pennisi F
Primo
;
Signorelli C
Ultimo
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Adult vaccination remains suboptimal, particularly among older adults and individuals with chronic conditions. Hospitals represent a strategic setting for improving vaccination coverage among these high-risk populations. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated hospital-based interventions aimed at enhancing vaccine uptake in adults aged ≥60 years or 18–64 years with at-risk medical conditions. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Searches in PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus identified studies published in the last 10 years evaluating hospital-based interventions reporting vaccination uptake. The risk of bias was assessed using validated tools (NOS, RoB 2, ROBINS-I, QI-MQCS). A meta-analysis was conducted for categories with ≥3 eligible studies reporting pre- and post-intervention vaccination coverage in the same population. Results: We included 44 studies. Multi-component strategies (n = 21) showed the most consistent results (e.g., pneumococcal uptake from 2.2% to 43.4%, p < 0.001). Reminder-based interventions (n = 4) achieved influenza coverage increases from 31.0% to 68.0% and a COVID-19 booster uptake boost of +38% after SMS reminders. Educational strategies (n = 11) varied in effectiveness, with one study reporting influenza coverage rising from 1.6% to 12.2% (+662.5%, OR 8.86, p < 0.01). Standing order protocols increased pneumococcal vaccination from 10% to 60% in high-risk adults. Hospital-based catch-up programs improved DTaP-IPV uptake from 56.2% to 80.8% (p < 0.001). For patient education, the pooled OR was 2.11 (95% CI: 1.96–2.27; p < 0.001, I2 = 97.2%) under a fixed-effects model, and 2.47 (95% CI: 1.53–3.98; p < 0.001) under a random-effects model. For multi-component strategies, the OR was 2.39 (95% CI: 2.33–2.44; p < 0.001, I2 = 98.0%) with fixed effects, and 3.12 (95% CI: 2.49–3.92; p < 0.001) with random effects. No publication bias was detected. Conclusions: Hospital-based interventions, particularly those using multi-component approaches, effectively improve vaccine coverage in older and high-risk adults. Embedding vaccination into routine hospital care offers a scalable opportunity to reduce disparities and enhance population-level protection. Future policies should prioritize the institutional integration of such strategies to support healthy aging and vaccine equity.
2025
Inglese
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
13
14
1667
39
Pubblicato
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/13/14/1667
Esperti anonimi
Internazionale
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
adult immunization; healthcare interventions; high-risk patients; hospital-based vaccination; multi-component interventions; systematic review; vaccination coverage; vaccine uptake
No
Improving Vaccine Coverage Among Older Adults and High-Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hospital-Based Strategies / Pennisi, F; Borlini, S; Cuciniello, R; D'Amelio, Ac; Calabretta, R; Pinto, A; Signorelli, C. - In: HEALTHCARE. - ISSN 2227-9032. - 13:14(2025). [10.3390/healthcare13141667]
open
7
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Pennisi, F; Borlini, S; Cuciniello, R; D'Amelio, Ac; Calabretta, R; Pinto, A; Signorelli, C
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1.1 Articolo in rivista - Review
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
healthcare-13-01667.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.71 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.71 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/194329
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact