Active-passive voice alternation is central to scientific writing, addressed both in journal style guidelines – often simplistically – and in academic writing instruction, which highlights its rhetorical complexity. Despite existing linguistic descriptions of the passive’s discourse functions, more applied research is needed on how novice writers use it in developing academic writing. This study examines how medical students employ the passive in research article introductions, using systemic functional linguistics theory to analyse variation according to process type, Agent role and rhetorical move. Results show that in Introduction sections, passives are mostly Agent-less relational processes with categorising or literature-review functions and that ergativity – rather than transitivity – better explains passive use in scientific English. They also show how writers align with discourse conventions while simultaneously displaying individual stylistic variation.

Construing voice and agency in medical students’ writing: A systemic functional linguistic analysis of research article introductions / Freddi, M.. - In: LANGUAGE, CONTEXT AND TEXT. - ISSN 2589-7233. - 7:2(2025), pp. 200-233. [10.1075/langct.00086.fre]

Construing voice and agency in medical students’ writing: A systemic functional linguistic analysis of research article introductions

Maria Freddi
2025-01-01

Abstract

Active-passive voice alternation is central to scientific writing, addressed both in journal style guidelines – often simplistically – and in academic writing instruction, which highlights its rhetorical complexity. Despite existing linguistic descriptions of the passive’s discourse functions, more applied research is needed on how novice writers use it in developing academic writing. This study examines how medical students employ the passive in research article introductions, using systemic functional linguistics theory to analyse variation according to process type, Agent role and rhetorical move. Results show that in Introduction sections, passives are mostly Agent-less relational processes with categorising or literature-review functions and that ergativity – rather than transitivity – better explains passive use in scientific English. They also show how writers align with discourse conventions while simultaneously displaying individual stylistic variation.
2025
voice
agency
medical academic writing
SFL
voice, agency, medical academic writing, SFL
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
langct.00086.fre.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 462.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
462.07 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/195216
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact