The aim was to assess the blending effect of universal-shade resin-based composites (RBCs) (Omnichroma—OC; Clearfil Majesty Universal–CM; Venus Pearl—V; Transcend—T) used for repair for lithium disilicate blocks. Fifteen parallelepiped-shaped (10.5 × 10.5 × 3 mm) specimens with four cavities (3 mm in diameter and 2 mm in depth) were designed from lithium disilicate CAD/CAM blocks (CEREC Tessera HT A3) and milled. Specimens were then randomly divided into five groups based on the five resin composite materials for cavity restoration (n = 12): Group 1, control group (F); Group 2 (T); Group 3 (OC); Group 4 (V); and Group 5 (CM). After surface conditioning, composite resins were applied to the ceramic surface. Color measurements were taken with a colorimeter in the center of the resin restoration and on the CAD/CAM block. Tristimulus values were converted to CIELab color coordinates and color differences were expressed in ΔE00 units using the CIEDE-2000 formula. F showed significantly better color matching (ΔE00 = 2.51 ± 0.64) in comparison to single-shade RBCs except T (ΔE00 = 2.55 ± 0.64). All groups exceeded perceptibility and acceptability thresholds. The control group presented higher color matching than the single shade universal composites except for Transcend.
Chameleon Effect of Universal Shade Composite Polymers in Repairing CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate / Paolone, G.; Collivasone, G.; De Masi, N.; Heinichen, A.; Greco, K.; Gherlone, E.; Cantatore, G.. - In: MATERIALS. - ISSN 1996-1944. - 18:13(2025). [10.3390/ma18133020]
Chameleon Effect of Universal Shade Composite Polymers in Repairing CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate
Paolone G.
Primo
;Gherlone E.Penultimo
;Cantatore G.Ultimo
2025-01-01
Abstract
The aim was to assess the blending effect of universal-shade resin-based composites (RBCs) (Omnichroma—OC; Clearfil Majesty Universal–CM; Venus Pearl—V; Transcend—T) used for repair for lithium disilicate blocks. Fifteen parallelepiped-shaped (10.5 × 10.5 × 3 mm) specimens with four cavities (3 mm in diameter and 2 mm in depth) were designed from lithium disilicate CAD/CAM blocks (CEREC Tessera HT A3) and milled. Specimens were then randomly divided into five groups based on the five resin composite materials for cavity restoration (n = 12): Group 1, control group (F); Group 2 (T); Group 3 (OC); Group 4 (V); and Group 5 (CM). After surface conditioning, composite resins were applied to the ceramic surface. Color measurements were taken with a colorimeter in the center of the resin restoration and on the CAD/CAM block. Tristimulus values were converted to CIELab color coordinates and color differences were expressed in ΔE00 units using the CIEDE-2000 formula. F showed significantly better color matching (ΔE00 = 2.51 ± 0.64) in comparison to single-shade RBCs except T (ΔE00 = 2.55 ± 0.64). All groups exceeded perceptibility and acceptability thresholds. The control group presented higher color matching than the single shade universal composites except for Transcend.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
materials-18-03020.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.26 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.26 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


