Objective: This study aimed to establish global benchmark outcomes indicators for robotic liver resections (R-LR). Background: In recent years, minimally invasive liver resections and in particular R-LR has seen an increase in uptake in recent years. Although, benchmark outcomes have been recently established for laparoscopic (L) -LR, this has not been established for R-LR. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 5,213 patients undergoing R-LR in 51 international centers between 2016 and 2022. Benchmark cutoffs for 16 outcome indicators of low-risk R-LR were established. The 75th percentile of individual center medians for a given outcome indicator was set as the benchmark cutoff. Four procedures were selected for benchmarking: left lateral sectionectomy(LLS)/H23, left hepatectomy(LH)/H234±1, right hepatectomy(RH)/H5678±1 and right posterior sectionectomy/H67 (RPS). Results: There were 1,654 R-LR cases (528 LLS/H23, 432 LH/H234±1, 408 RH/H5678±1, 286 RPS/H67) performed in 24 expert centers, of which 518 (31.3%) R-LR cases qualified as low risk benchmark cases. Benchmark outcomes were established for R-LLS/H23, R-LH/ H234±1, R-RH/ H5678±1 and R-RPS/H67 for operation time (190, 323, 474, 413) min, open conversion rate (0.0, 0.0, 1.3, 0.0)%, estimated blood loss (100, 250, 600, 550) mls, blood transfusion rate (0.0,0.0, 20.0, 29.2)%, postoperative major morbidity (0.0,0.0, 20.9, 16.7)%, 90-day mortality (0.0, 0.0,0.0, 0.0)% and textbook outcome (12.5,24.3,0,0)%. Conclusions: The present study established the first global benchmark values for R-LR. It provided an up-to-date reference of best achievable outcomes for auditing and benchmarking.
Defining Global Benchmarks for Robotic Liver Resections: An International Multicenter Study / Goh, B. K. P.; Sucandy, I.; Chua, D. W.; Liu, Q.; Edwin, B.; Aghayan, D.; Millet, G.; Ratti, F.; Zhang, W.; Scatton, O.; Coelho, F. F.; Dokmak, S.; Mazzaferro, V.; Chiow, A. K. H.; Primavesi, F.; Ivanecz, A.; Choi, S. -H.; Lee, J. H.; Prieto, M.; Vivarelli, M.; Giuliante, F.; Ruzzenente, A.; Yong, C. -C.; Yin, M.; Fondevila, C.; Efanov, M.; Morise, Z.; Di Benedetto, F.; Brustia, R.; Valle, R. D.; Boggi, U.; Geller, D.; Belli, A.; Memeo, R.; Hasegawa, K.; Croner, R. S.; Gruttadauria, S.; Hawksworth, J.; Park, J. O.; Rotellar, F.; Choi, G. -H.; Robles-Campos, R.; Wang, X.; Sutcliffe, R. P.; Krenzien, F.; Pratschke, J.; Lai, E. C. H.; Chong, C. C. N.; Ishizawa, T.; Monden, K.; Lopez-Ben, S.; Kingham, T. P.; Ferrero, A.; Ettorre, G. M.; Liang, X.; Mejia, A.; Marino, M. V.; Swijnenburg, R. -J.; Wakabayashi, G.; Troisi, R. I.; Cheung, T. -T.; Sugioka, A.; Sugimoto, M.; Labgaa, I.; Schmelzle, M.; Hatano, E.; Cillo, U.; Long, T. C. D.; Peng, Y.; Wei, Y.; Yong, Z.; El Adel, S.; Han, H. -S.; Soubrane, O.; Fuks, D.; Chen, K. -H.; D'Hondt, M.; Abu Hilal, M.; Aldrighetti, L.; Cipriani, F.. - In: ANNALS OF SURGERY. - ISSN 0003-4932. - (2025). [10.1097/SLA.0000000000006852]
Defining Global Benchmarks for Robotic Liver Resections: An International Multicenter Study
Ratti F.;Belli A.;Aldrighetti L.Ultimo
;Cipriani F.Membro del Collaboration Group
2025-01-01
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to establish global benchmark outcomes indicators for robotic liver resections (R-LR). Background: In recent years, minimally invasive liver resections and in particular R-LR has seen an increase in uptake in recent years. Although, benchmark outcomes have been recently established for laparoscopic (L) -LR, this has not been established for R-LR. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 5,213 patients undergoing R-LR in 51 international centers between 2016 and 2022. Benchmark cutoffs for 16 outcome indicators of low-risk R-LR were established. The 75th percentile of individual center medians for a given outcome indicator was set as the benchmark cutoff. Four procedures were selected for benchmarking: left lateral sectionectomy(LLS)/H23, left hepatectomy(LH)/H234±1, right hepatectomy(RH)/H5678±1 and right posterior sectionectomy/H67 (RPS). Results: There were 1,654 R-LR cases (528 LLS/H23, 432 LH/H234±1, 408 RH/H5678±1, 286 RPS/H67) performed in 24 expert centers, of which 518 (31.3%) R-LR cases qualified as low risk benchmark cases. Benchmark outcomes were established for R-LLS/H23, R-LH/ H234±1, R-RH/ H5678±1 and R-RPS/H67 for operation time (190, 323, 474, 413) min, open conversion rate (0.0, 0.0, 1.3, 0.0)%, estimated blood loss (100, 250, 600, 550) mls, blood transfusion rate (0.0,0.0, 20.0, 29.2)%, postoperative major morbidity (0.0,0.0, 20.9, 16.7)%, 90-day mortality (0.0, 0.0,0.0, 0.0)% and textbook outcome (12.5,24.3,0,0)%. Conclusions: The present study established the first global benchmark values for R-LR. It provided an up-to-date reference of best achievable outcomes for auditing and benchmarking.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
unpaywall-bitstream-1478046328.pdf
embargo fino al 25/07/2026
Tipologia:
Post-print (versione valutata in peer review)
Licenza:
Licenza OA dell'editore
Dimensione
2.3 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.3 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


