Background: Robotic liver surgery (RLS) has become the preferred minimally invasive approach for liver surgery. However, especially for complex RLS (C-RLS), key surgical steps such as preoperative preparation, intraoperative techniques, and training are often center-dependent and not standardized. The aim of this survey was to assess the international practice of key surgical steps during C-RLS among expert centers. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among robotic liver surgeons with a minimum individual experience of 50 RLS to assess their practice during C-RLS. The survey consisted of 50 questions, distributed across three sections: training, preoperative planning, and intraoperative practice for C-RLS. Results: 60 out of 71 experts completed the survey, corresponding to an 85% response rate. 73% of the experts agreed that the IWATE difficulty score represents an adequate classification system to define C-RLS. A prerequisite before performing C-RLS was experience in complex open liver surgery (71%) and expertise in low and intermediate RLS (75%). Mentoring by a more experienced surgeon was deemed necessary by most experts (90%) when performing C-RLS. Vascular inflow control was mentioned to often be performed during parenchyma transection either selectively (38%) or routinely (52%). Most experts considered pre- or intraoperative positive staining helpful (57%), while negative staining (85%) was reported as even more important in C-RLS. For vasculo-biliary transection, experts preferred an intrafascial (45%), glissonian pedicle approach (33%) or a case-dependent transection (12%). For parenchymal transection, the preferred instruments were laparoscopic CUSA (92%), harmonic ACE (78%), and SynchroSeal (77%). Conclusion: This expert survey reveals current international practices for preoperative preparation, training, and intraoperative key steps of C-RLS. Prospective validation of the key steps would be useful for correlating clinical outcomes with current practice.

Key steps of complex robotic liver surgery: an international expert survey / Aegerter, N. L. E.; Kuemmerli, C.; Nickel, F.; Guidetti, C.; Tschuor, C.; Lopez-Lopez, V.; Wakabayashi, T.; Dutkowski, P.; Billeter, A. T.; Muller, B. P.; Muller, P. C.; De Wilde, R.; Wakabayashi, G.; Troisi, R. I.; Toso, C.; Swijnenburg, R. -J.; Sutcliffe, R. I.; Sucandy, I.; Strucker, B.; Stattner, S.; Starlinger, P.; Soubrane, O.; Seehofer, D.; Schmelzle, M.; Scatton, O.; Saint-Marc, O.; Robles-Campos, R.; Reissfelder, C.; Ratti, F.; Rahbari, N.; Primavesi, F.; Pratschke, J.; Marques, H. P.; Park, J.; Panaro, F.; Oberkofler, C. E.; Nakano, Y.; Memeo, R.; Martinie, J. B.; Machado, M.; Lurje, G.; Lin, C. C. -W.; Lim, C.; Lesurtel, M.; Lee, J. H.; Kron, P.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Jonas, J. P.; D'Hondt, M.; Heumann, A.; He, J.; Hawksworth, J.; Hagendoorn, J.; Goh, B. K. P.; Gilg, S.; Geller, D.; Ferrero, A.; Di Benedetto, F.; Croner, R.; Cheah, Y. L.; Cao, H. T.; Broring, D. C.; Boggi, U.; Alseidi, A.; Aldrighetti, L.; Ahmad, J.; Hilal, M. A.; Abe, Y.. - In: SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0930-2794. - 39:10(2025), pp. 6692-6701. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1007/s00464-025-12020-9]

Key steps of complex robotic liver surgery: an international expert survey

Ratti F.;Aldrighetti L.;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background: Robotic liver surgery (RLS) has become the preferred minimally invasive approach for liver surgery. However, especially for complex RLS (C-RLS), key surgical steps such as preoperative preparation, intraoperative techniques, and training are often center-dependent and not standardized. The aim of this survey was to assess the international practice of key surgical steps during C-RLS among expert centers. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among robotic liver surgeons with a minimum individual experience of 50 RLS to assess their practice during C-RLS. The survey consisted of 50 questions, distributed across three sections: training, preoperative planning, and intraoperative practice for C-RLS. Results: 60 out of 71 experts completed the survey, corresponding to an 85% response rate. 73% of the experts agreed that the IWATE difficulty score represents an adequate classification system to define C-RLS. A prerequisite before performing C-RLS was experience in complex open liver surgery (71%) and expertise in low and intermediate RLS (75%). Mentoring by a more experienced surgeon was deemed necessary by most experts (90%) when performing C-RLS. Vascular inflow control was mentioned to often be performed during parenchyma transection either selectively (38%) or routinely (52%). Most experts considered pre- or intraoperative positive staining helpful (57%), while negative staining (85%) was reported as even more important in C-RLS. For vasculo-biliary transection, experts preferred an intrafascial (45%), glissonian pedicle approach (33%) or a case-dependent transection (12%). For parenchymal transection, the preferred instruments were laparoscopic CUSA (92%), harmonic ACE (78%), and SynchroSeal (77%). Conclusion: This expert survey reveals current international practices for preoperative preparation, training, and intraoperative key steps of C-RLS. Prospective validation of the key steps would be useful for correlating clinical outcomes with current practice.
2025
Inglese
Springer
39
10
6692
6701
10
Epub ahead of print
Esperti anonimi
Internazionale
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Complex robotic liver resection
Liver resection
Robotic liver surgery
Key steps of complex robotic liver surgery: an international expert survey / Aegerter, N. L. E.; Kuemmerli, C.; Nickel, F.; Guidetti, C.; Tschuor, C.; Lopez-Lopez, V.; Wakabayashi, T.; Dutkowski, P.; Billeter, A. T.; Muller, B. P.; Muller, P. C.; De Wilde, R.; Wakabayashi, G.; Troisi, R. I.; Toso, C.; Swijnenburg, R. -J.; Sutcliffe, R. I.; Sucandy, I.; Strucker, B.; Stattner, S.; Starlinger, P.; Soubrane, O.; Seehofer, D.; Schmelzle, M.; Scatton, O.; Saint-Marc, O.; Robles-Campos, R.; Reissfelder, C.; Ratti, F.; Rahbari, N.; Primavesi, F.; Pratschke, J.; Marques, H. P.; Park, J.; Panaro, F.; Oberkofler, C. E.; Nakano, Y.; Memeo, R.; Martinie, J. B.; Machado, M.; Lurje, G.; Lin, C. C. -W.; Lim, C.; Lesurtel, M.; Lee, J. H.; Kron, P.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Jonas, J. P.; D'Hondt, M.; Heumann, A.; He, J.; Hawksworth, J.; Hagendoorn, J.; Goh, B. K. P.; Gilg, S.; Geller, D.; Ferrero, A.; Di Benedetto, F.; Croner, R.; Cheah, Y. L.; Cao, H. T.; Broring, D. C.; Boggi, U.; Alseidi, A.; Aldrighetti, L.; Ahmad, J.; Hilal, M. A.; Abe, Y.. - In: SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0930-2794. - 39:10(2025), pp. 6692-6701. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1007/s00464-025-12020-9]
none
68
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Aegerter, N. L. E.; Kuemmerli, C.; Nickel, F.; Guidetti, C.; Tschuor, C.; Lopez-Lopez, V.; Wakabayashi, T.; Dutkowski, P.; Billeter, A. T.; Muller, B....espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/199457
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact