PURPOSE Surgical axillary staging in patients with node-positive breast cancer (BC) who converted to clinical node negativity through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has changed significantly in recent years. Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) and target lymph node (TLN) biopsy (TLNB) became increasingly popular. However, data comparing marking techniques for the TLN are limited. Here, we evaluate marking techniques in the largest prospective cohort worldwide. MATERIALS AND METHODS Among patients from the ongoing prospective multicenter AXSANA (EUBREAST-03) study who received TLN marking and TAD/TLNB, we evaluated different marking methods with respect to detection and removal rates and clinical performance. RESULTS Until January 6, 2025, 6,129 patients from 26 countries were enrolled. Of these patients, 2,596 had >= 1 TLN marked before NACT and completed surgery; 13.3% of the patients had >= 4 suspicious nodes at diagnosis. Pre-NACT TLN marking used a clip in 2,003 patients (77.2%), magnetic seed in 287 (11.1%), carbon ink in 192 (7.4%), radar marker in 119 (4.6%), radioactive seed in 18 (0.7%), radiofrequency identification device (RFID) in 12 (0.5%), or other methods in two (0.1%). One TLN was marked in 2,427 patients (93.5%), two TLNs in 138 (5.3%), and >= 3 in 27 patients (1%). Targeted removal of the TLN was planned in 2,100 patients (80.9%; TAD in 2,076 [80.0%] and TLNB in 24 [0.9%]). The TLN was detected and removed by TAD/TLNB in 1,915 patients (91.2%). TLN detection rate was the highest in patients whose TLNs were marked pre-NACT with markers suitable for probe-guided detection (96.6%; radioactive seed: 100%, magnetic seed: 96.9%, radar marker: 96.1%, RFID: 90%), followed by carbon ink (94.9%) and clip (89.6%; P < .001). CONCLUSION This large prospective analysis of patients with initially clinically node-positive BC receiving NACT demonstrates that probe-guided detection markers used to mark metastatic nodes before NACT provide superior detection rates.

Marking Techniques for Target Lymph Nodes in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy in the AXSANA/EUBREAST-03/AGO-B-053 Study / Banys-Paluchowski, M.; Hartmann, S.; De Boniface, J.; Gentilini, O. D.; Ditsch, N.; Stickeler, E.; Karadeniz Cakmak, G.; Hauptmann, M.; Schroth, J.; Thill, M.; Di Micco, R.; Hahn, M.; Murawa, D.; Rubio, I. T.; Pinto, D.; Kontos, M.; Niinikoski, L.; Gasparri, M. L.; Nina, H.; Rebaza, L. P.; Fröhlich, S.; Schmidt, E.; Wihlfahrt, K.; Berger, T.; Basali, T.; Ruf, F.; Rief, A.; Bonci, E. A.; Peintinger, F.; Schlichting, E.; Valiyeva Qanimat, H.; Vanhoeij, M.; Kadayaprath, G.; Dostalek, L.; Kothari, A.; Perhavec, A.; Ivanov, T.; Zippel, D.; Adamczyk, B.; Porpiglia, M.; Gürleyik, G. M.; Untch, M.; Lux, M. P.; Jursik, K.; Kolberg, H. C.; Reimer, T.; Tauber, N.; Rody, A.; Matrai, Z.; Krawczyk, N.; Thongvitokomarn, S.; Kühn, T.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0732-183X. - 44:7(2026), pp. 575-585. [10.1200/JCO-25-01921]

Marking Techniques for Target Lymph Nodes in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy in the AXSANA/EUBREAST-03/AGO-B-053 Study

Gentilini O. D.;
2026-01-01

Abstract

PURPOSE Surgical axillary staging in patients with node-positive breast cancer (BC) who converted to clinical node negativity through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has changed significantly in recent years. Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) and target lymph node (TLN) biopsy (TLNB) became increasingly popular. However, data comparing marking techniques for the TLN are limited. Here, we evaluate marking techniques in the largest prospective cohort worldwide. MATERIALS AND METHODS Among patients from the ongoing prospective multicenter AXSANA (EUBREAST-03) study who received TLN marking and TAD/TLNB, we evaluated different marking methods with respect to detection and removal rates and clinical performance. RESULTS Until January 6, 2025, 6,129 patients from 26 countries were enrolled. Of these patients, 2,596 had >= 1 TLN marked before NACT and completed surgery; 13.3% of the patients had >= 4 suspicious nodes at diagnosis. Pre-NACT TLN marking used a clip in 2,003 patients (77.2%), magnetic seed in 287 (11.1%), carbon ink in 192 (7.4%), radar marker in 119 (4.6%), radioactive seed in 18 (0.7%), radiofrequency identification device (RFID) in 12 (0.5%), or other methods in two (0.1%). One TLN was marked in 2,427 patients (93.5%), two TLNs in 138 (5.3%), and >= 3 in 27 patients (1%). Targeted removal of the TLN was planned in 2,100 patients (80.9%; TAD in 2,076 [80.0%] and TLNB in 24 [0.9%]). The TLN was detected and removed by TAD/TLNB in 1,915 patients (91.2%). TLN detection rate was the highest in patients whose TLNs were marked pre-NACT with markers suitable for probe-guided detection (96.6%; radioactive seed: 100%, magnetic seed: 96.9%, radar marker: 96.1%, RFID: 90%), followed by carbon ink (94.9%) and clip (89.6%; P < .001). CONCLUSION This large prospective analysis of patients with initially clinically node-positive BC receiving NACT demonstrates that probe-guided detection markers used to mark metastatic nodes before NACT provide superior detection rates.
2026
Inglese
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
44
7
575
585
11
Pubblicato
Esperti anonimi
Internazionale
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Goal 5: Gender equality
Marking Techniques for Target Lymph Nodes in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy in the AXSANA/EUBREAST-03/AGO-B-053 Study / Banys-Paluchowski, M.; Hartmann, S.; De Boniface, J.; Gentilini, O. D.; Ditsch, N.; Stickeler, E.; Karadeniz Cakmak, G.; Hauptmann, M.; Schroth, J.; Thill, M.; Di Micco, R.; Hahn, M.; Murawa, D.; Rubio, I. T.; Pinto, D.; Kontos, M.; Niinikoski, L.; Gasparri, M. L.; Nina, H.; Rebaza, L. P.; Fröhlich, S.; Schmidt, E.; Wihlfahrt, K.; Berger, T.; Basali, T.; Ruf, F.; Rief, A.; Bonci, E. A.; Peintinger, F.; Schlichting, E.; Valiyeva Qanimat, H.; Vanhoeij, M.; Kadayaprath, G.; Dostalek, L.; Kothari, A.; Perhavec, A.; Ivanov, T.; Zippel, D.; Adamczyk, B.; Porpiglia, M.; Gürleyik, G. M.; Untch, M.; Lux, M. P.; Jursik, K.; Kolberg, H. C.; Reimer, T.; Tauber, N.; Rody, A.; Matrai, Z.; Krawczyk, N.; Thongvitokomarn, S.; Kühn, T.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0732-183X. - 44:7(2026), pp. 575-585. [10.1200/JCO-25-01921]
none
52
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Banys-Paluchowski, M.; Hartmann, S.; De Boniface, J.; Gentilini, O. D.; Ditsch, N.; Stickeler, E.; Karadeniz Cakmak, G.; Hauptmann, M.; Schroth, J.; T...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/199577
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact