This clinical consensus statement revisits the role of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as a measurement of cardiac function, a prognostic marker and a major criterion to classify patients with heart failure, and gives new advice for clinical practice. Heart failure is traditionally classified on the basis of LVEF thresholds and this has major implications for treatment recommendations. However, the reproducibility of LVEF measurement is poor and its prognostic and diagnostic value lessens when it is above 45%, with no relationship with the severity of either cardiac dysfunction or outcomes at higher values. These limitations dictate the need for a more comprehensive approach to classify and assess heart failure focusing more on the trajectory of LVEF rather than to its absolute value. Furthermore, the assessment of LVEF is not required for the initiation of treatments like sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and diuretics in patients with suspected de novo heart failure and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Future research utilizing advanced imaging techniques and biomarkers which can better characterize myocardial structure, metabolism and performance may facilitate the identification of alternative therapeutic targets and better ways to monitor heart failure therapies across the entire spectrum of LVEF.

The use of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure. A Clinical Consensus Statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC, the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), and the Japanese Heart Failure Society (JHFS) / Rosano, G. M. C.; Teerlink, J. R.; Kinugawa, K.; Bayes-Genis, A.; Chioncel, O.; Fang, J.; Greenberg, B.; Ibrahim, N. E.; Imamura, T.; Inomata, T.; Kuwahara, K.; Moura, B.; Onwuanyi, A.; Sato, N.; Savarese, G.; Sakata, Y.; Sweitzer, N.; Wilcox, J.; Yamamoto, K.; Metra, M.; Coats, A. J. S.. - In: JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE. - ISSN 1071-9164. - (2025). [10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.03.014]

The use of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure. A Clinical Consensus Statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC, the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), and the Japanese Heart Failure Society (JHFS)

Metra M.
Penultimo
;
2025-01-01

Abstract

This clinical consensus statement revisits the role of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as a measurement of cardiac function, a prognostic marker and a major criterion to classify patients with heart failure, and gives new advice for clinical practice. Heart failure is traditionally classified on the basis of LVEF thresholds and this has major implications for treatment recommendations. However, the reproducibility of LVEF measurement is poor and its prognostic and diagnostic value lessens when it is above 45%, with no relationship with the severity of either cardiac dysfunction or outcomes at higher values. These limitations dictate the need for a more comprehensive approach to classify and assess heart failure focusing more on the trajectory of LVEF rather than to its absolute value. Furthermore, the assessment of LVEF is not required for the initiation of treatments like sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and diuretics in patients with suspected de novo heart failure and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Future research utilizing advanced imaging techniques and biomarkers which can better characterize myocardial structure, metabolism and performance may facilitate the identification of alternative therapeutic targets and better ways to monitor heart failure therapies across the entire spectrum of LVEF.
2025
Inglese
Elsevier B.V.
Pubblicato
https://onlinejcf.com/article/S1071-9164(25)00153-8/fulltext
Esperti anonimi
Internazionale
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Diagnosis
Heart failure
Left ventricular ejection fraction
Management
Phenotypes
The use of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure. A Clinical Consensus Statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC, the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), and the Japanese Heart Failure Society (JHFS) / Rosano, G. M. C.; Teerlink, J. R.; Kinugawa, K.; Bayes-Genis, A.; Chioncel, O.; Fang, J.; Greenberg, B.; Ibrahim, N. E.; Imamura, T.; Inomata, T.; Kuwahara, K.; Moura, B.; Onwuanyi, A.; Sato, N.; Savarese, G.; Sakata, Y.; Sweitzer, N.; Wilcox, J.; Yamamoto, K.; Metra, M.; Coats, A. J. S.. - In: JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE. - ISSN 1071-9164. - (2025). [10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.03.014]
none
21
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Rosano, G. M. C.; Teerlink, J. R.; Kinugawa, K.; Bayes-Genis, A.; Chioncel, O.; Fang, J.; Greenberg, B.; Ibrahim, N. E.; Imamura, T.; Inomata, T.; Kuw...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1.1 Articolo in rivista - Review
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/200316
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact