Aims: The impact of treatment for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) across different levels of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of surgical and transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) to conservative (medical) management across LVEF categories. Methods and results: Patients with severe isolated TR from the TRIGISTRY, a multicentre international registry, were categorized based on LVEF (preserved ejection fraction [pEF]: ≥50%, mildly reduced ejection fraction [mrEF]: 41–49%, and reduced ejection fraction [rEF]: ≤40%). We assessed the impact of treatment modality and procedural success (mild-to-moderate or lower residual TR) on 2-year survival within each LVEF category. Among 2384 patients, 1383 had pEF, 400 had mrEF, and 601 had rEF. Compared to conservative management, surgery (p < 0.0005) and TTVI (p < 0.0001) were associated with a survival benefit in patients with pEF. No significant survival advantage was observed in patients with mrEF (p = 0.28 for both), nor in those with rEF (p = 0.76 and p = 0.22, respectively). Similar results were obtained when surgical and transcatheter interventions were grouped (p < 0.0001, p = 0.17 and p = 0.29 in patients with pEF, mrEF and rEF, respectively). Patients with residual TR after TTVI exhibited a trend toward worse survival compared to those managed conservatively across all LVEF categories (p = 0.47, p = 0.33 and p = 0.008 in pEF, mrEF and rEF, respectively). Conclusions: Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention, whether surgical or transcatheter-based, was associated with improved survival in patients with pEF but not in those with mrEF or rEF. Residual TR remained a significant prognostic factor across the entire LVEF spectrum. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection when considering TTVI in individuals with rEF.
Left ventricular ejection fraction and benefit of tricuspid valve interventions – insights from the international TRIGISTRY / Heitzinger, G.; Dreyfus, J.; Dannenberg, V.; Topilsky, Y.; Benfari, G.; Marsan, N. A.; Taramasso, M.; Russo, G.; Bohbot, Y.; Iliadis, C.; Weber, M.; Nombela-Franco, L.; Eixeres-Esteve, A.; Bazire, B.; Iung, B.; Obadia, J. -F.; Loureiro, R. E.; Riant, E.; Donal, E.; Habib, G.; Lavie-Badie, Y.; Hausleiter, J.; Stolz, L.; Badano, L.; Le Tourneau, T.; Coisne, A.; Modine, T.; Praz, F.; Zamorano, J. L.; Von Bardeleben, R. S.; Hahn, R. T.; Fam, N.; Sievert, H.; Muraru, D.; Adamo, M.; Heuts, S.; Nejjari, M.; Chan, V.; De Bonis, M.; Carnero-Alcazar, M.; Rudolph, V.; Crestanello, J.; Lurz, P.; Bax, J.; Gauda, R.; Bernick, J.; Wells, G. A.; Maisano, F.; Enriquez-Sarano, M.; Bartko, P.; Messika-Zeitoun, D.. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE. - ISSN 1388-9842. - (2025). [10.1002/ejhf.3797]
Left ventricular ejection fraction and benefit of tricuspid valve interventions – insights from the international TRIGISTRY
De Bonis M.;Maisano F.;
2025-01-01
Abstract
Aims: The impact of treatment for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) across different levels of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of surgical and transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) to conservative (medical) management across LVEF categories. Methods and results: Patients with severe isolated TR from the TRIGISTRY, a multicentre international registry, were categorized based on LVEF (preserved ejection fraction [pEF]: ≥50%, mildly reduced ejection fraction [mrEF]: 41–49%, and reduced ejection fraction [rEF]: ≤40%). We assessed the impact of treatment modality and procedural success (mild-to-moderate or lower residual TR) on 2-year survival within each LVEF category. Among 2384 patients, 1383 had pEF, 400 had mrEF, and 601 had rEF. Compared to conservative management, surgery (p < 0.0005) and TTVI (p < 0.0001) were associated with a survival benefit in patients with pEF. No significant survival advantage was observed in patients with mrEF (p = 0.28 for both), nor in those with rEF (p = 0.76 and p = 0.22, respectively). Similar results were obtained when surgical and transcatheter interventions were grouped (p < 0.0001, p = 0.17 and p = 0.29 in patients with pEF, mrEF and rEF, respectively). Patients with residual TR after TTVI exhibited a trend toward worse survival compared to those managed conservatively across all LVEF categories (p = 0.47, p = 0.33 and p = 0.008 in pEF, mrEF and rEF, respectively). Conclusions: Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention, whether surgical or transcatheter-based, was associated with improved survival in patients with pEF but not in those with mrEF or rEF. Residual TR remained a significant prognostic factor across the entire LVEF spectrum. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection when considering TTVI in individuals with rEF.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
