Vitreoretinal surgery, while clinically advanced and increasingly prevalent, presents a substantial environmental burden due to the widespread use of disposable instruments, fluorinated gases, and energy-intensive infrastructure. This narrative review explores sustainability in vitreoretinal practice, identifying key contributors to its carbon footprint and outlining strategies for mitigation. The environmental impact of tamponade agents—particularly sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), with its extremely high global warming potential—is emphasized through data from recent multicenter studies. Additional contributors include inefficient gas delivery systems, single-use surgical instruments, and the disposal of persistent toxic substances. The article also addresses how expanding surgical indications and reliance on single-use technologies have compounded ecological costs. Evidence-based strategies for improving sustainability are discussed, including the use of air tamponade in selected cases, gas dilution protocols, adoption of single-use canisters, reusable instrumentation, optimized OR workflows, and teleophthalmology pathways that reduce unnecessary postoperative visits. Sustainable vitreoretinal surgery is presented not only as a possibility but as a clinical, ethical, and environmental imperative, achievable without compromising patient outcomes.

From Innovation to Conservation: Sustainable Pathways in Vitreoretinal Practice / Iuliano, Lorenzo; Gonfiantini, Marco; Bandello, Francesco; Lanzetta, Paolo. - In: JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY. - ISSN 2090-004X. - 2025:1(2025). [10.1155/joph/5598625]

From Innovation to Conservation: Sustainable Pathways in Vitreoretinal Practice

Bandello, Francesco;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Vitreoretinal surgery, while clinically advanced and increasingly prevalent, presents a substantial environmental burden due to the widespread use of disposable instruments, fluorinated gases, and energy-intensive infrastructure. This narrative review explores sustainability in vitreoretinal practice, identifying key contributors to its carbon footprint and outlining strategies for mitigation. The environmental impact of tamponade agents—particularly sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), with its extremely high global warming potential—is emphasized through data from recent multicenter studies. Additional contributors include inefficient gas delivery systems, single-use surgical instruments, and the disposal of persistent toxic substances. The article also addresses how expanding surgical indications and reliance on single-use technologies have compounded ecological costs. Evidence-based strategies for improving sustainability are discussed, including the use of air tamponade in selected cases, gas dilution protocols, adoption of single-use canisters, reusable instrumentation, optimized OR workflows, and teleophthalmology pathways that reduce unnecessary postoperative visits. Sustainable vitreoretinal surgery is presented not only as a possibility but as a clinical, ethical, and environmental imperative, achievable without compromising patient outcomes.
2025
carbon footprint
disposable
fluorinated gases
global warming potential
greenhouse gas
sustainability
vitreoretinal surgery
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/200988
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact