: BackgroundRehaCom, a computerized cognitive rehabilitation program for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), has been studied primarily in relation to treatment "dose" (duration, frequency, and adherence), with less focus on which training modules drive improvement or which participant factors predict responsiveness. This secondary analysis of the CogEx trial investigated whether progression within specific RehaCom modules was associated with processing speed improvement, measured by the SDMT, and whether baseline characteristics predicted response in participants with progressive MS.MethodsA total of 153 participants completed 12 weeks of RehaCom training across 5 attention-based modules. Cognition was assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months using the SDMT. Correlation and regression analyses evaluated associations between module progression and cognitive outcomes.ResultsProgression correlated significantly with SDMT improvement in 4 modules, with the strongest effects for Attention/Concentration (r = .37, P < .001) and Divided Attention-2 (r = .36, P < .001). Higher baseline SDMT, higher premorbid IQ, older age, and greater module progression independently predicted better SDMT performance at12-weeks (adjusted R2 = .73). At 6 months, higher baseline SDMT, greater progression in Attention/Concentration and Divided Attention-2, older age, and female sex predicted better SDMT performance (adjusted R2 = .71).ConclusionProcessing speed gains in progressive MS were related to both module-specific progression and participant characteristics, supporting a precision approach to cognitive rehabilitation that tailors training content to individual cognitive profiles. This study is a secondary analysis of the CogEx trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03679468; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03679468).

Looking Beyond Dose: Identifying Responders and Non-Responders to RehaCom Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation in Progressive MS—The CogEx Study / Meza, Cecilia; Hernandez, Roberto S.; Costa, Silvana L.; Salter, Amber; Chiaravalloti, Nancy D.; Amato, Maria Pia; Brichetto, Giampaolo; Chataway, Jeremy; Cutter, Gary; Dalgas, Ulrik; Deluca, John; Farrell, Rachel; Feys, Peter; Filippi, Massimo; Freeman, Jennifer; Inglese, Matilde; Motl, Robert W.; Rocca, Maria A.; Sandroff, Brian M.; Feinstein, Anthony; Null, Null. - In: NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR. - ISSN 1545-9683. - (2026). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1177/15459683261432556]

Looking Beyond Dose: Identifying Responders and Non-Responders to RehaCom Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation in Progressive MS—The CogEx Study

Filippi, Massimo;Rocca, Maria A.;
2026-01-01

Abstract

: BackgroundRehaCom, a computerized cognitive rehabilitation program for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), has been studied primarily in relation to treatment "dose" (duration, frequency, and adherence), with less focus on which training modules drive improvement or which participant factors predict responsiveness. This secondary analysis of the CogEx trial investigated whether progression within specific RehaCom modules was associated with processing speed improvement, measured by the SDMT, and whether baseline characteristics predicted response in participants with progressive MS.MethodsA total of 153 participants completed 12 weeks of RehaCom training across 5 attention-based modules. Cognition was assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months using the SDMT. Correlation and regression analyses evaluated associations between module progression and cognitive outcomes.ResultsProgression correlated significantly with SDMT improvement in 4 modules, with the strongest effects for Attention/Concentration (r = .37, P < .001) and Divided Attention-2 (r = .36, P < .001). Higher baseline SDMT, higher premorbid IQ, older age, and greater module progression independently predicted better SDMT performance at12-weeks (adjusted R2 = .73). At 6 months, higher baseline SDMT, greater progression in Attention/Concentration and Divided Attention-2, older age, and female sex predicted better SDMT performance (adjusted R2 = .71).ConclusionProcessing speed gains in progressive MS were related to both module-specific progression and participant characteristics, supporting a precision approach to cognitive rehabilitation that tailors training content to individual cognitive profiles. This study is a secondary analysis of the CogEx trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03679468; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03679468).
2026
25-apr-2026
Inglese
Epub ahead of print
Esperti anonimi
Internazionale
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
cognitive impairment
computerized cognitive rehabilitation
processing speed
progressive multiple sclerosis
symbol digit modalities test (SDMT)
Looking Beyond Dose: Identifying Responders and Non-Responders to RehaCom Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation in Progressive MS—The CogEx Study / Meza, Cecilia; Hernandez, Roberto S.; Costa, Silvana L.; Salter, Amber; Chiaravalloti, Nancy D.; Amato, Maria Pia; Brichetto, Giampaolo; Chataway, Jeremy; Cutter, Gary; Dalgas, Ulrik; Deluca, John; Farrell, Rachel; Feys, Peter; Filippi, Massimo; Freeman, Jennifer; Inglese, Matilde; Motl, Robert W.; Rocca, Maria A.; Sandroff, Brian M.; Feinstein, Anthony; Null, Null. - In: NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR. - ISSN 1545-9683. - (2026). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1177/15459683261432556]
none
21
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Meza, Cecilia; Hernandez, Roberto S.; Costa, Silvana L.; Salter, Amber; Chiaravalloti, Nancy D.; Amato, Maria Pia; Brichetto, Giampaolo; Chataway, Jer...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
   Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/201860
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact