Background: Although vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is considered the central strategy against the pandemic, uptake lags behind target rates. Method: To explore whether this rate could be enhanced by a nudging strategy that exploits the status quo bias, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in northern Italy comparing vaccination acceptance among 2000 adults, ages 50 to 59 years, who were either invited to set an appointment (opt-in group) or assigned an individual appointment (opt-out group). Results: Results indicate a difference of 3.2 percentage points, which represents a 32% relative increase in the vaccination rate for the opt-out group compared with the opt-in group. Conclusions: A significant portion of those who remain unvaccinated may not hold strong beliefs against vaccination but rather tend to inaction and may therefore be nudged toward vaccination with a reduction of action required. Reluctant adults (50-59 years), who had not yet received vaccines against COVID-19, were sent letters announcing appointment availability In an RCT, the status quo option in the notices influenced the rate of vaccine acceptance Nudging via pre-scheduled appointments encouraged vaccine uptake more than invitations to schedule did Switching the default option yielded a 32% relative increase (13.1% vs. 9.9%) in vaccination.

Nudging COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake by Changing the Default: A Randomized Controlled Trial / Tentori, K., Pighin, S., Giovanazzi, G., Grignolio Corsini, A., Timberlake, B., Ferro, A.. - In: MEDICAL DECISION MAKING. - ISSN 0272-989X. - 42:6(2022), pp. 837-841. [10.1177/0272989X221101536]

Nudging COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake by Changing the Default: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Grignolio Corsini A.;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Background: Although vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is considered the central strategy against the pandemic, uptake lags behind target rates. Method: To explore whether this rate could be enhanced by a nudging strategy that exploits the status quo bias, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in northern Italy comparing vaccination acceptance among 2000 adults, ages 50 to 59 years, who were either invited to set an appointment (opt-in group) or assigned an individual appointment (opt-out group). Results: Results indicate a difference of 3.2 percentage points, which represents a 32% relative increase in the vaccination rate for the opt-out group compared with the opt-in group. Conclusions: A significant portion of those who remain unvaccinated may not hold strong beliefs against vaccination but rather tend to inaction and may therefore be nudged toward vaccination with a reduction of action required. Reluctant adults (50-59 years), who had not yet received vaccines against COVID-19, were sent letters announcing appointment availability In an RCT, the status quo option in the notices influenced the rate of vaccine acceptance Nudging via pre-scheduled appointments encouraged vaccine uptake more than invitations to schedule did Switching the default option yielded a 32% relative increase (13.1% vs. 9.9%) in vaccination.
2022
COVID-19
default option
nudging
status quo bias
vaccination
vaccine hesitancy
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tentori, K., S. Pighin, et al._Nudging COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake by Changing the Default. A Randomized Controlled Trial_2022.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Tentori, K., S. Pighin, et al._Nudging COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake by Changing the Default. A Randomized Controlled Trial_2022
Tipologia: PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 399.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
399.56 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/202118
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 18
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact