Abstract Background: Although vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is considered the central strategy against the pandemic, uptake lags behind target rates. Method: To explore whether this rate could be enhanced by a nudging strategy that exploits the status quo bias, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in northern Italy comparing vaccination acceptance among 2000 adults, ages 50 to 59 years, who were either invited to set an appointment (opt-in group) or assigned an individual appointment (opt-out group). Results: Results indicate a difference of 3.2 percentage points, which represents a 32% relative increase in the vaccination rate for the opt-out group compared with the opt-in group. Conclusions: A significant portion of those who remain unvaccinated may not hold strong beliefs against vaccination but rather tend to inaction and may therefore be nudged toward vaccination with a reduction of action required. Highlights: Reluctant adults (50-59 years), who had not yet received vaccines against COVID-19, were sent letters announcing appointment availabilityIn an RCT, the status quo option in the notices influenced the rate of vaccine acceptanceNudging via pre-scheduled appointments encouraged vaccine uptake more than invitations to schedule didSwitching the default option yielded a 32% relative increase (13.1% vs. 9.9%) in vaccination.

It is (not) rocket science: Public health communication experience as expressed by participants at an international workshop / Lugli, C., Ferrari, E., Filippini, T., Grignolio Corsini, A., Odone, A., Vinceti, M., Righi, E., Palandri, L.. - In: POPULATION MEDICINE. - ISSN 2654-1459. - 6:20 July(2024). [10.18332/POPMED/191254]

It is (not) rocket science: Public health communication experience as expressed by participants at an international workshop

Grignolio Corsini A.;Odone A.;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Abstract Background: Although vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is considered the central strategy against the pandemic, uptake lags behind target rates. Method: To explore whether this rate could be enhanced by a nudging strategy that exploits the status quo bias, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in northern Italy comparing vaccination acceptance among 2000 adults, ages 50 to 59 years, who were either invited to set an appointment (opt-in group) or assigned an individual appointment (opt-out group). Results: Results indicate a difference of 3.2 percentage points, which represents a 32% relative increase in the vaccination rate for the opt-out group compared with the opt-in group. Conclusions: A significant portion of those who remain unvaccinated may not hold strong beliefs against vaccination but rather tend to inaction and may therefore be nudged toward vaccination with a reduction of action required. Highlights: Reluctant adults (50-59 years), who had not yet received vaccines against COVID-19, were sent letters announcing appointment availabilityIn an RCT, the status quo option in the notices influenced the rate of vaccine acceptanceNudging via pre-scheduled appointments encouraged vaccine uptake more than invitations to schedule didSwitching the default option yielded a 32% relative increase (13.1% vs. 9.9%) in vaccination.
2024
Inglese
6
20 July
Pubblicato
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Internazionale
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
No
It is (not) rocket science: Public health communication experience as expressed by participants at an international workshop / Lugli, C., Ferrari, E., Filippini, T., Grignolio Corsini, A., Odone, A., Vinceti, M., Righi, E., Palandri, L.. - In: POPULATION MEDICINE. - ISSN 2654-1459. - 6:20 July(2024). [10.18332/POPMED/191254]
none
8
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Lugli, C.; Ferrari, E.; Filippini, T.; Grignolio Corsini, A.; Odone, A.; Vinceti, M.; Righi, E.; Palandri, L.
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/202119
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact