We compared the outcomes of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in 719 patients with primary refractory (PR) or first relapse (Rel) secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML; n = 129) vs those with de novo AML (n = 590), who received HSCT between 2010 and 2022. A higher percentage of patients with sAML vs de novo AML had PR disease (73.6% vs 58.6%; P = .002). In 81.4% of patients with sAML, the antecedent hematological disorder was myelodysplastic syndrome. Engraftment was 83.5% vs 88.4% in sAML and de novo AML, respectively (P = .13). In multivariate analysis, haplo-HSCT outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups: nonrelapse mortality hazard ratio (HR), 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.98; P = .083), relapse incidence HR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.4.7.-1.00; P = .051). The HRs for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)–free, and GVHD and relapse–free survival were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.76-1.28; P = .94), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.77-1.29; P = .97), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.77-1.27; P = .94), respectively. We conclude that outcomes of haplo-HSCT with PTCy are not different for PR/Rel sAML in comparison with PR/Rel de novo AML, a finding of major clinical importance.

Haploidentical transplantation in primary refractory/relapsed secondary vs de novo AML: from the ALWP/EBMT / Nagler, A., Labopin, M., Tischer, J., Raiola, A.M., Kunadt, D., Vydra, J., Blaise, D., Chiusolo, P., Fanin, R., Winkler, J., Forcade, E., Van Gorkom, G., Ciceri, F., Mohty, M.. - In: BLOOD ADVANCES. - ISSN 2473-9529. - 8:15(2024), pp. 4223-4233. [10.1182/bloodadvances.2024012798]

Haploidentical transplantation in primary refractory/relapsed secondary vs de novo AML: from the ALWP/EBMT

Ciceri F.;
2024-01-01

Abstract

We compared the outcomes of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in 719 patients with primary refractory (PR) or first relapse (Rel) secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML; n = 129) vs those with de novo AML (n = 590), who received HSCT between 2010 and 2022. A higher percentage of patients with sAML vs de novo AML had PR disease (73.6% vs 58.6%; P = .002). In 81.4% of patients with sAML, the antecedent hematological disorder was myelodysplastic syndrome. Engraftment was 83.5% vs 88.4% in sAML and de novo AML, respectively (P = .13). In multivariate analysis, haplo-HSCT outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups: nonrelapse mortality hazard ratio (HR), 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.98; P = .083), relapse incidence HR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.4.7.-1.00; P = .051). The HRs for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)–free, and GVHD and relapse–free survival were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.76-1.28; P = .94), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.77-1.29; P = .97), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.77-1.27; P = .94), respectively. We conclude that outcomes of haplo-HSCT with PTCy are not different for PR/Rel sAML in comparison with PR/Rel de novo AML, a finding of major clinical importance.
2024
Inglese
American Society of Hematology
8
15
4223
4233
11
Pubblicato
Esperti anonimi
Internazionale
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Haploidentical transplantation in primary refractory/relapsed secondary vs de novo AML: from the ALWP/EBMT / Nagler, A., Labopin, M., Tischer, J., Raiola, A.M., Kunadt, D., Vydra, J., Blaise, D., Chiusolo, P., Fanin, R., Winkler, J., Forcade, E., Van Gorkom, G., Ciceri, F., Mohty, M.. - In: BLOOD ADVANCES. - ISSN 2473-9529. - 8:15(2024), pp. 4223-4233. [10.1182/bloodadvances.2024012798]
none
14
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Nagler, A.; Labopin, M.; Tischer, J.; Raiola, A. M.; Kunadt, D.; Vydra, J.; Blaise, D.; Chiusolo, P.; Fanin, R.; Winkler, J.; Forcade, E.; Van Gorkom,...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/203903
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact