Working Group 1 at ISUP’s Cancer Precursors meeting (September 2024) evaluated 5 putative precursors of invasive prostate cancer: high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), intraductal carcinoma (IDC), atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH)/adenosis, and proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA). Objectives were to compile recent evidence, interrogate current practices, and vote on recommendations, with 67% approval defined as consensus. Consensus was reached against the reporting of the low-grade form of PIN. HGPIN need not be reported when concomitant cancer or atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for cancer exists adjacent to it, for biopsy or prostatectomy specimens. Finally, while the clinical significance of unifocal HGPIN in biopsies remains uncertain, there is stronger evidence for multifocal isolated HGPIN as a predictor of subsequent cancer detection. By consensus, multifocal HGPIN should continue being reported. Slight refinement was achieved regarding IDC criteria. The consensus opinion was that a dense cribriform to solid proliferation need not demonstrate marked nuclear atypia/ pleomorphism to qualify as IDC. The inverse scenario of marked atypia without dense cribriform/solid proliferation fell just short (65%) of consensus for IDC. Redesignating cribriform HGPIN as AIP achieved consensus. AIP found alone or with grade group 1 cancer warrants an explanatory comment. However, agreement was not attained to report AIP in the presence of invasive cancer, in either needle biopsy or prostatectomy. Finally, the optional reporting of PIA or AAH/adenosis in biopsies as pertinent negatives both fell short of consensus. This guidance should help pathologists standardize reporting, staying focused on the clinically actionable aspects of these lesions.

International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus on Cancer Precursor Lesions. Working Group 1: The Prostate / Iczkowski, K.A., De Marzo, A.M., Agarwal, N., Berman, D.M., Cimadamore, A., Fine, S.W., Greenland, N., Khani, F., Loda, M., Lotan, T.L., Varma, M., Chinnaiyan, A., Giannarini, G., Huang, J., Montironi, R., Netto, G.J., Osunkoya, A.O., Ratliff, T., Kristiansen, G., Cheng, L., et al.. - In: THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY. - ISSN 0147-5185. - 49:12(2025). [10.1097/PAS.0000000000002430]

International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus on Cancer Precursor Lesions. Working Group 1: The Prostate

Colecchia M.;Necchi A.;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Working Group 1 at ISUP’s Cancer Precursors meeting (September 2024) evaluated 5 putative precursors of invasive prostate cancer: high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), intraductal carcinoma (IDC), atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH)/adenosis, and proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA). Objectives were to compile recent evidence, interrogate current practices, and vote on recommendations, with 67% approval defined as consensus. Consensus was reached against the reporting of the low-grade form of PIN. HGPIN need not be reported when concomitant cancer or atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for cancer exists adjacent to it, for biopsy or prostatectomy specimens. Finally, while the clinical significance of unifocal HGPIN in biopsies remains uncertain, there is stronger evidence for multifocal isolated HGPIN as a predictor of subsequent cancer detection. By consensus, multifocal HGPIN should continue being reported. Slight refinement was achieved regarding IDC criteria. The consensus opinion was that a dense cribriform to solid proliferation need not demonstrate marked nuclear atypia/ pleomorphism to qualify as IDC. The inverse scenario of marked atypia without dense cribriform/solid proliferation fell just short (65%) of consensus for IDC. Redesignating cribriform HGPIN as AIP achieved consensus. AIP found alone or with grade group 1 cancer warrants an explanatory comment. However, agreement was not attained to report AIP in the presence of invasive cancer, in either needle biopsy or prostatectomy. Finally, the optional reporting of PIA or AAH/adenosis in biopsies as pertinent negatives both fell short of consensus. This guidance should help pathologists standardize reporting, staying focused on the clinically actionable aspects of these lesions.
2025
Inglese
Wolters Kluwer Health
49
12
Pubblicato
Esperti anonimi
Internazionale
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
atypical intraductal proliferation
consensus conference
intraductal carcinoma
precursor lesion
prostate
prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus on Cancer Precursor Lesions. Working Group 1: The Prostate / Iczkowski, K.A., De Marzo, A.M., Agarwal, N., Berman, D.M., Cimadamore, A., Fine, S.W., Greenland, N., Khani, F., Loda, M., Lotan, T.L., Varma, M., Chinnaiyan, A., Giannarini, G., Huang, J., Montironi, R., Netto, G.J., Osunkoya, A.O., Ratliff, T., Kristiansen, G., Cheng, L., et al.. - In: THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY. - ISSN 0147-5185. - 49:12(2025). [10.1097/PAS.0000000000002430]
none
144
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Iczkowski, K. A.; De Marzo, A. M.; Agarwal, N.; Berman, D. M.; Cimadamore, A.; Fine, S. W.; Greenland, N.; Khani, F.; Loda, M.; Lotan, T. L.; Varma, M...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/204293
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact