Background: Functional motor disorders (FMDs) represent a frequent and disabling neurological condition. The lack of reliable diagnostic biomarkers and their heterogeneity might affect diagnosis. We identified multimodal biomarkers distinguishing FMDs from healthy controls (HCs) using machine-learning approaches. Methods: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, consecutive adults with a clinically established FMDs diagnosis (n = 75, 74.7% female; mean age 44.20 ± 12.92) and age- and sex-matched HCs (n = 75; 58.6% female; 48.42 ± 11.67) were recruited. All participants underwent standardized behavioral, neurophysiological, and brain MRI assessment exploring motor, exteroceptive, and interoceptive domains. A Random Forest (RF) classifier combined with repeated stratified k-fold cross-validation was trained on the collected features. Predictive performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, and AUC-ROC. SHapley Additive exPlanations interpreted feature importance. Results: The strongest diagnostic biomarkers were lower dual-task effect scores for postural sway area under eyes-closed motor and cognitive conditions, and gait speed during the motor dual-task, followed by increased vDMN and basal ganglia networks functional connectivity, reduced baseline ipsilateral–contralateral R2 blink reflex area, and higher DNIC-to-baseline N2P2 amplitude ratios for the lower limb. The RF classifier achieved robust performance (accuracy 85.0%, sensitivity 83.9%, specificity 86.1%, F1-score 85.7%, AUC-ROC 0.921). Conclusions: Motor, functional neuroimaging, and neurophysiological markers demonstrated diagnostic value in distinguishing FMDs from healthy controls, addressing the current lack of objective tools and supporting more confident and accurate diagnosis of these heterogeneous conditions. Trial Registration: Trial registration number NCT06328790. Registered on 26 March 2024.

Identifying diagnostic biomarkers in functional motor disorders through multimodal behavioral, neurophysiological, and imaging assessment using explainable machine learning / Gandolfi, M., Sandri, A., Russo, M., Sarasso, E., Gardoni, A., Basaia, S., Erro, R., Cuoco, S., Carotenuto, I., Ricciardi, C., Amato, F., Vinciguerra, C., Botto, A., Amboni, M., Romano, D., Di Vico, I.A., Fiorio, M., Pedrotti, G., Paolicelli, A., Crestani, M., et al.. - In: JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY. - ISSN 0340-5354. - 273:5(2026). [10.1007/s00415-026-13838-6]

Identifying diagnostic biomarkers in functional motor disorders through multimodal behavioral, neurophysiological, and imaging assessment using explainable machine learning

Gardoni A.;Basaia S.;Filippi M.;Agosta F.
Penultimo
;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Background: Functional motor disorders (FMDs) represent a frequent and disabling neurological condition. The lack of reliable diagnostic biomarkers and their heterogeneity might affect diagnosis. We identified multimodal biomarkers distinguishing FMDs from healthy controls (HCs) using machine-learning approaches. Methods: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, consecutive adults with a clinically established FMDs diagnosis (n = 75, 74.7% female; mean age 44.20 ± 12.92) and age- and sex-matched HCs (n = 75; 58.6% female; 48.42 ± 11.67) were recruited. All participants underwent standardized behavioral, neurophysiological, and brain MRI assessment exploring motor, exteroceptive, and interoceptive domains. A Random Forest (RF) classifier combined with repeated stratified k-fold cross-validation was trained on the collected features. Predictive performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, and AUC-ROC. SHapley Additive exPlanations interpreted feature importance. Results: The strongest diagnostic biomarkers were lower dual-task effect scores for postural sway area under eyes-closed motor and cognitive conditions, and gait speed during the motor dual-task, followed by increased vDMN and basal ganglia networks functional connectivity, reduced baseline ipsilateral–contralateral R2 blink reflex area, and higher DNIC-to-baseline N2P2 amplitude ratios for the lower limb. The RF classifier achieved robust performance (accuracy 85.0%, sensitivity 83.9%, specificity 86.1%, F1-score 85.7%, AUC-ROC 0.921). Conclusions: Motor, functional neuroimaging, and neurophysiological markers demonstrated diagnostic value in distinguishing FMDs from healthy controls, addressing the current lack of objective tools and supporting more confident and accurate diagnosis of these heterogeneous conditions. Trial Registration: Trial registration number NCT06328790. Registered on 26 March 2024.
2026
30-apr-2026
Inglese
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
273
5
299
Pubblicato
Esperti anonimi
Internazionale
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Biomarkers
Functional neuroimaging
Gait disorders
Machine learning
Pain
Postural balance
No
Identifying diagnostic biomarkers in functional motor disorders through multimodal behavioral, neurophysiological, and imaging assessment using explainable machine learning / Gandolfi, M., Sandri, A., Russo, M., Sarasso, E., Gardoni, A., Basaia, S., Erro, R., Cuoco, S., Carotenuto, I., Ricciardi, C., Amato, F., Vinciguerra, C., Botto, A., Amboni, M., Romano, D., Di Vico, I.A., Fiorio, M., Pedrotti, G., Paolicelli, A., Crestani, M., et al.. - In: JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY. - ISSN 0340-5354. - 273:5(2026). [10.1007/s00415-026-13838-6]
none
44
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Gandolfi, M.; Sandri, A.; Russo, M.; Sarasso, E.; Gardoni, A.; Basaia, S.; Erro, R.; Cuoco, S.; Carotenuto, I.; Ricciardi, C.; Amato, F.; Vinciguerra,...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
   European Union
   Next Generation EU–NRRP M6C2–Investment 2.1 Enhancement and strengthening of biomedical research in the NHS
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/204601
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact