Background Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is usually contraindicated in perforated cholecystitis, although initial reports suggest feasibility in contained perforation. Methods This prospective single-center cohort study aimed to explore EUS-GBD outcomes in patients with acute cholecystitis with contained perforation (cp-AC; Niemeier classification type 2). A secondary exploratory comparison was performed with a contemporaneous cohort of patients with intact gallbladder walls. Results Between January 2021 and March 2025, 23 patients with cp-AC (39.7% of the overall EUS-GBD cohort) were enrolled. This subgroup showed high prevalence of underlying malignancy (87.0%) and previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with placement of metal stents (65.2%). Median operative space and interluminal distance were 30.5 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 26.0-37.0) and 5 mm (IQR 2-8), respectively. Technical and clinical success of EUS-GBD were 100% (95%CI 85.7-100) and 87.0% (95%CI 67.9-95.5), respectively. The adverse event rate was 21.7% (95%CI 9.7-41.9) and did not differ significantly from that in the cohort with intact gallbladder walls; however, two fatal events occurred in the cp-AC group. Conclusions EUS-GBD appeared to be technically feasible in patients with contained perforation, despite the additional complexity. However, this represents a particularly high-risk population, and the procedure may be considered only for carefully selected patients in expert centers.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis with contained perforation: a prospective cohort study / Vanella, G., Guilabert, L., Frigo, F., Stasio, R.C., Leone, R., Tacelli, M., Archibugi, L., Liscia, N., Leta, L.C., Pecorelli, N., Belfiori, G., Aparicio, J.R., De Madaria, E., Reni, M., Falconi, M., Capurso, G., Arcidiacono, P.G.. - In: ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0013-726X. - (2026). [10.1055/a-2848-3876]

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis with contained perforation: a prospective cohort study

Vanella G.
Primo
;
Tacelli M.;Archibugi L.;Pecorelli N.;Belfiori G.;Reni M.;Falconi M.;Capurso G.
Penultimo
;
Arcidiacono P. G.
Ultimo
2026-01-01

Abstract

Background Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is usually contraindicated in perforated cholecystitis, although initial reports suggest feasibility in contained perforation. Methods This prospective single-center cohort study aimed to explore EUS-GBD outcomes in patients with acute cholecystitis with contained perforation (cp-AC; Niemeier classification type 2). A secondary exploratory comparison was performed with a contemporaneous cohort of patients with intact gallbladder walls. Results Between January 2021 and March 2025, 23 patients with cp-AC (39.7% of the overall EUS-GBD cohort) were enrolled. This subgroup showed high prevalence of underlying malignancy (87.0%) and previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with placement of metal stents (65.2%). Median operative space and interluminal distance were 30.5 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 26.0-37.0) and 5 mm (IQR 2-8), respectively. Technical and clinical success of EUS-GBD were 100% (95%CI 85.7-100) and 87.0% (95%CI 67.9-95.5), respectively. The adverse event rate was 21.7% (95%CI 9.7-41.9) and did not differ significantly from that in the cohort with intact gallbladder walls; however, two fatal events occurred in the cp-AC group. Conclusions EUS-GBD appeared to be technically feasible in patients with contained perforation, despite the additional complexity. However, this represents a particularly high-risk population, and the procedure may be considered only for carefully selected patients in expert centers.
2026
Inglese
GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
6
Pubblicato
https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-2848-3876#publication-history-container
Esperti anonimi
Internazionale
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis with contained perforation: a prospective cohort study / Vanella, G., Guilabert, L., Frigo, F., Stasio, R.C., Leone, R., Tacelli, M., Archibugi, L., Liscia, N., Leta, L.C., Pecorelli, N., Belfiori, G., Aparicio, J.R., De Madaria, E., Reni, M., Falconi, M., Capurso, G., Arcidiacono, P.G.. - In: ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0013-726X. - (2026). [10.1055/a-2848-3876]
reserved
17
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Vanella, G.; Guilabert, L.; Frigo, F.; Stasio, R. C.; Leone, R.; Tacelli, M.; Archibugi, L.; Liscia, N.; Leta, L. C.; Pecorelli, N.; Belfiori, G.; Apa...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
a-2848-3876.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: PDF editoriale (versione pubblicata dall'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 2.55 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.55 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/204916
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact