OBJECTIVE: To establish global benchmark outcomes indicators for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomies (L-RPSs)/H67. BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive liver resections have seen an increase in uptake in recent years. Over time, challenging procedures such as L-RPS/H67 are also increasingly adopted. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 854 patients undergoing minimally invasive RPS in 57 international centers in 4 continents between 2015 and 2021. There were 651 pure L-RPS and 160 robotic RPS. Sixteen outcome indicators of low-risk L-RPS cases were selected to establish benchmark cutoffs. The 75th percentile of individual center medians for a given outcome indicator was set as the benchmark cutoff. RESULTS: There were 573 L-RPS/H67 performed in 43 expert centers, of which 254 L-RPS/H67 (44.3%) cases qualified as low-risk benchmark cases. The benchmark outcomes established for operation time, open conversion rate, blood loss ≥500 mL, blood transfusion rate, postoperative morbidity, major morbidity, 90-day mortality, and textbook outcome after L-RPS were 350.8 minutes, 12.5%, 53.8%, 22.9%, 23.8%, 2.8%, 0%, and 4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study established the first global benchmark values for L-RPS/H6/7. The benchmark provided an up-to-date reference of the best achievable outcomes for surgical auditing and benchmarking.

Defining Global Benchmarks for Laparoscopic Right Posterior Sectionectomy/H67: An International Multicenter Study / Zhao, J., Lu, Y., Zhang, W., Chua, D.W., Liu, Q., Liu, R., Pratschke, J., Ratti, F., Zimmitti, G., Aghayan, D.L., Edwin, B., Siow, T.-F., Scatton, O., Herman, P., Marino, M.V., Mazzaferro, V., Chiow, A.K.H., Sucandy, I., Ivanecz, A., Choi, S.H., et al.. - In: ANNALS OF SURGERY. - ISSN 1528-1140. - 283:2(2026), pp. 297-307. [10.1097/SLA.0000000000006418]

Defining Global Benchmarks for Laparoscopic Right Posterior Sectionectomy/H67: An International Multicenter Study

Ratti F.;Aldrighetti L.;
2026-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish global benchmark outcomes indicators for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomies (L-RPSs)/H67. BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive liver resections have seen an increase in uptake in recent years. Over time, challenging procedures such as L-RPS/H67 are also increasingly adopted. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 854 patients undergoing minimally invasive RPS in 57 international centers in 4 continents between 2015 and 2021. There were 651 pure L-RPS and 160 robotic RPS. Sixteen outcome indicators of low-risk L-RPS cases were selected to establish benchmark cutoffs. The 75th percentile of individual center medians for a given outcome indicator was set as the benchmark cutoff. RESULTS: There were 573 L-RPS/H67 performed in 43 expert centers, of which 254 L-RPS/H67 (44.3%) cases qualified as low-risk benchmark cases. The benchmark outcomes established for operation time, open conversion rate, blood loss ≥500 mL, blood transfusion rate, postoperative morbidity, major morbidity, 90-day mortality, and textbook outcome after L-RPS were 350.8 minutes, 12.5%, 53.8%, 22.9%, 23.8%, 2.8%, 0%, and 4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study established the first global benchmark values for L-RPS/H6/7. The benchmark provided an up-to-date reference of the best achievable outcomes for surgical auditing and benchmarking.
2026
benchmark
global
hepatectomy
laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy
minimally invasive
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
defining_global_benchmarks_for_laparoscopic_right.961.pdf

embargo fino al 28/02/2027

Tipologia: Post-print (versione valutata in peer review)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.98 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.98 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/206177
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact