Context: Lymph node (LN) involvement in penile cancer is associated with poor survival. Early diagnosis and management significantly impact survival, with multimodal treatment approaches often considered in advanced disease. Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness of treatment options available for the management of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenopathy in men with penile cancer. Evidence acquisition: EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases were searched from 1990 to July 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomised comparative studies (NRCSs), and case series (CSs) were included. Evidence synthesis: We identified 107 studies, involving 9582 patients from two RCTs, 28 NRCSs, and 77 CSs. The quality of evidence is considered poor. Surgery is the mainstay of LN disease management, with early inguinal LN dissection (ILND) associated with better outcomes. Videoendoscopic ILND may offer comparable survival outcomes to open ILND with lower wound-related morbidity. Ipsilateral pelvic LN dissection (PLND) in N2–3 cases improves overall survival in comparison to no pelvic surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in N2–3 disease showed a pathological complete response rate of 13% and an objective response rate of 51%. Adjuvant radiotherapy may benefit pN2–3 but not pN1 disease. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may provide a small survival benefit in N3 disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve outcomes after PLND for pelvic LN metastases. Conclusions: Early LND improves survival in nodal disease in penile cancer. Multimodal treatments may provide additional benefit in pN2–3 cases; however, data are limited. Therefore, individualised management of patients with nodal disease should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting. Patient summary: Spread of penile cancer to the lymph nodes is best managed with surgery, which improves survival and has curative potential. Supplementary treatment, including the use of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, may further improve survival in advanced disease. Patients with penile cancer with lymph node involvement should be treated by a multidisciplinary team.

Management of Lymph Node–positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review / Sachdeva, A., Mcguinness, L., Zapala, L., Greco, I., Garcia-Perdomo, H.A., Kailavasan, M., Antunes-Lopes, T., Ayres, B., Barreto, L., Campi, R., Crook, J., Johnstone, P., Kumar, V., Manzie, K., Marcus, J.D., Necchi, A., Oliveira, P., Osborne, J., Pagliaro, L.C., Protzel, C., et al.. - In: EUROPEAN UROLOGY. - ISSN 0302-2838. - 85:3(2024), pp. 257-273. [10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.018]

Management of Lymph Node–positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review

Necchi A.;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Context: Lymph node (LN) involvement in penile cancer is associated with poor survival. Early diagnosis and management significantly impact survival, with multimodal treatment approaches often considered in advanced disease. Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness of treatment options available for the management of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenopathy in men with penile cancer. Evidence acquisition: EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases were searched from 1990 to July 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomised comparative studies (NRCSs), and case series (CSs) were included. Evidence synthesis: We identified 107 studies, involving 9582 patients from two RCTs, 28 NRCSs, and 77 CSs. The quality of evidence is considered poor. Surgery is the mainstay of LN disease management, with early inguinal LN dissection (ILND) associated with better outcomes. Videoendoscopic ILND may offer comparable survival outcomes to open ILND with lower wound-related morbidity. Ipsilateral pelvic LN dissection (PLND) in N2–3 cases improves overall survival in comparison to no pelvic surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in N2–3 disease showed a pathological complete response rate of 13% and an objective response rate of 51%. Adjuvant radiotherapy may benefit pN2–3 but not pN1 disease. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may provide a small survival benefit in N3 disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve outcomes after PLND for pelvic LN metastases. Conclusions: Early LND improves survival in nodal disease in penile cancer. Multimodal treatments may provide additional benefit in pN2–3 cases; however, data are limited. Therefore, individualised management of patients with nodal disease should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting. Patient summary: Spread of penile cancer to the lymph nodes is best managed with surgery, which improves survival and has curative potential. Supplementary treatment, including the use of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, may further improve survival in advanced disease. Patients with penile cancer with lymph node involvement should be treated by a multidisciplinary team.
2024
Inglese
Elsevier B.V.
85
3
257
273
17
Pubblicato
Esperti anonimi
Internazionale
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
Chemoradiotherapy
Chemotherapy
Inguinal lymph-node dissection
Lymph-node management
Management
Multimodal therapy
Penile cancer
Radiotherapy
Sì
Management of Lymph Node–positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review / Sachdeva, A., Mcguinness, L., Zapala, L., Greco, I., Garcia-Perdomo, H.A., Kailavasan, M., Antunes-Lopes, T., Ayres, B., Barreto, L., Campi, R., Crook, J., Johnstone, P., Kumar, V., Manzie, K., Marcus, J.D., Necchi, A., Oliveira, P., Osborne, J., Pagliaro, L.C., Protzel, C., et al.. - In: EUROPEAN UROLOGY. - ISSN 0302-2838. - 85:3(2024), pp. 257-273. [10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.018]
none
31
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Sachdeva, A.; Mcguinness, L.; Zapala, L.; Greco, I.; Garcia-Perdomo, H. A.; Kailavasan, M.; Antunes-Lopes, T.; Ayres, B.; Barreto, L.; Campi, R.; Croo...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1.1 Articolo in rivista - Review
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11768/208404
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 55
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 48
social impact